Doing this at home will give you phenomenal overall result with not so much time investment. It's not so difficult. We're talking about a sum total of... Really? Yeah, yeah. Doing that per week will radically transform your body.

Dr. Michael Isreytel is a leading sports scientist who provides no-nonsense science-based strategies on muscle building, fat loss, and helping people maximize their fitness potential.

My mission is to get everyone in as good of shape as possible with minimum time investment.

So where do we start?

So it's the consistency that matters. It doesn't matter if it's 2 hours a week or if it's 18 hours a week. If you're consistent, you can get amazing benefits. And then there's specificity, which is the most important principle in all of exercise science. It's telling yourself, Okay, I want bigger biceps, and then focus on that. And also every real working set should be challenging.

Is there a perfect amount of repetitions to do? There is.

It's a trade secret, but it's...

How long will it take me to lose the muscles that I've gained if I don't go back to the gym?

After about two weeks of not lifting, we start to lose muscle. But most people think, Oh, my God, another eight months just to get back to where I started? But when you gain an initial amount of muscle, it never goes back to the same size as when you started. It's just always going to be bigger.

Then I've got a couple of hours a week. I just want to get a bit leaner and I want to gain some muscle.

Okay, the first thing we do is go.

Dr. Michael, are there any supplements you suggest I take?

Whey protein, Caesium protein.

What about steroids?

Jesus Christ, I'm really going to say this. He's recently on a boatload of steroids. There are a few downsides.

What are the downsides that no one's talking about?

They're unspeakable. You I really want to know.

Dr. Michael, what is the mission that you find yourself on in this phase of your life?

For those who would like to get everyone who would like in as good of shape as possible with as minimum of a time investment, injury probability, and inconvenience in general as possible and the highest likelihood of best results while trying to completely excise doing anything that is pointless, and also, I say this politely, telling people things that aren't true. We're trying to get as many people fit, leaner, more muscular, more flexible, healthier, et cetera, as humanly possible, to the extent that they are interested in that thing, because not everyone's into fitness, and I understand that. I think I look freaky and it scares certain people, so I have a lot of time for that. But if you want to get fit, we're trying our best.

What are the big myths that end up standing in the way of most people? When they hear this conversation now, what are the most frequent rebuttals that you'll get when you say that someone can get in shape and be lean with limited time?

Two super common ones are, I don't have the time to work out, and into that time to work out is included, I don't have regular gym access, or I technically do, but I'd have to drive to the gym. I just don't have the time or the bandwidth where I don't have the scheduling, positioning in my life to do this thing. And baked into that is the assumption that getting much healthier and much leaner and much more muscular takes an inordinate amount of time. One of the most common questions I get out in the real world when people happen to look in my general direction, because usually people just go, What the hell is wrong in that guy's head? But one of the most common questions I get is, how many hours a day do you work out? Or how many days a week do you work out? And every single person is expecting an answer that is asking the tallest basketball player you've ever met, How how tall they are. You want an answer that's two and a half meters. You want something meaty. And if they tell you, I'm a meter 90, you're like, Isn't that cool?

And every time I tell them how much I work out, which is really at my real, trying to be as as bodybuilding as possible, it is really eight hours a week. And this is to do this insane thing for people just trying to be fit and healthy, et cetera. We're talking about a sum total of one hour per week, split into two or three 20-ish minute sessions, something we'll be trying later on, is such a huge stimulus and can radically transform your body, especially if you have attention to nutrition. And that's the second thing that's a big dogma, big myth, is people have ideas about what comes in to nutrition, and nutrition for being more lean, more muscular, and healthier. They have all these a constellation of ideas. Economist and philosopher Thomas Sowell calls them notions. If you have a hierarchy of understanding, you have theory at the top, which is gravitation, evolution, things super, super confirmed. Just beneath that, you have model, the standard model in physics. It's not quite good enough, quite good enough support be a theory, but it's a very well-understood space with a few mysteries. Under that, you have a hypothesis, which is you have a real good idea formally phrased.

And underneath that, you have a notion. And a notion is just things people say and people are like, . And no one even asks or answers about, Is this really true? And so when you talk to people about nutrition or they talk to you about why they're not in such great shape, another thing I get is when you're pretty jacked and lean and you sit next to someone on a plane, they treat you almost like a religious figure, like a priest or an imam. And they're like, Apologize. They're like, Oh, you look like you're in good shape. I just haven't been to the gym. I'm like, I love you as a human being, no matter all the time. Really? All the time.

They apologize for the state they're in.

More or less, yeah. Well, they'll see me eat a protein bar and they're getting the food on the plane and they're like, This is bad for me. I'm like, No, it's actually quite fine. They're always a little bit confused. So all these ideas people have about nutrition, organic, artificial sweeteners are bad, gluten free, GMOs. You have to have very meticulously well-prepared meals. There is a ton of food that's huge, laundry list of food that's unhealthy and bad for you, makes you fat. There are other foods that are a little bit more nuanced and difficult to find that are super health foods and will radically transform you. I can go on for hours about these myths, but people come in with these myths as notions, as things they believe that they're like, This is how it is, right? And when you tell them, Actually, that's not true, a lot of them are like, No way, because maybe that's the first time they've heard about it. So you tell people working out doesn't have to last forever. If you do it intelligently, which is what we specialize at RP about teaching people how to do and demonstrating digital products, you can get into really good shape with not so much time investment, and it's not so difficult.

It's difficult in the moment as far as you got to try hard, but an hour of trying hard a week is not the end of the world. Then on a nutritional front, they come in and they think it takes all these crazy special things. People watch me eat regular food and I'll be like, You eat that? I'm like, Yes. But I thought, But do you need the super special food? That's never been true. But people come in with their stack of ideas, and there's just dozens and dozens of myths on both ends.

We'll go through all of those myths. But my last question before we get into it is, why does it matter to be in good shape? I'm asking you here to really draw on some of the case studies that you've probably been exposed to where people have turned their lives around. What is the net benefit of someone who's listening right now, who's maybe heard about fitness stuff before and has heard from personal trainers and bodybuilders and whoever else, but for whatever reason, they just haven't been able to get off the sofa and get into action? It's difficult. Why should they? Why should they care?

I love that question. The first thing I'll say is maybe not a surprise to many of the people that know me. Politically, I'm like super pro-freedom, freedom of all kinds, inclusion. And that means to me also that if someone doesn't want to pursue fitness, As a human being, you have the same love and respect, at least for me, that anyone who is fit would have. And so as far as it'll just make you a better person and you got to get fit, people will see people that are obese and they're like, Look, lazy. And how do they live with themselves? I don't ever think things like that. Not because I'm a good person. I'm not a good person at all. But what fitness won't give you is it won't elevate your status as a better person in some way. However, the other benefits of fitness, we could have a 10-hour podcast where I just go through them one at a time, and we would never get through all of them. I'll give you a couple of samlings, the big hitters. One is health, straight up. So if you You reduce your body fat substantially, and you increase your muscularity substantially, and you adopt a lifestyle of moderate to moderately high physical activity quite regularly.

This is about as close in real life as we have so far to a panacea, a cure-all. It isn't cure-all, but the degree of preventative, you won't get really sick very soon, effect that has is just radical. I, just coming off of them, but if it's okay to say, it was recently on a boatload of steroids, the worst ones, got bloodwork right in the middle of that. Because I was very lean and very physically active and very muscular, my bloodwork's stellar. Just being leaner and more muscular more active just cleans your blood work up like crazy and makes you a long term... It increases your longevity considerably, but it does something I think is pretty close to equally important. It increases the The amount of time you're having in your life while you're alive. It makes it way better. It reduces the morbidity. Because you can be around a long time living in an assisted care facility and on machines to keep it... You're alive, sure, but there's something missing there. But if you have more muscle, less fat, and more physical activity, you ever see an 80-year-old that's like cardio walking down the street and you're like, My man, it'll give you that.

So that's a big deal. So health, it'll give you, usually people experience a perception of wellness that's psychological. They just feel better. They feel cleaner. They feel more energy. The cognitive benefits of health and fitness are now being addressed seriously in the literature, and they have been for a little while, but it's swelling, is unequivocally true now to say that regularly engaging in fitness makes you literally smarter, just straight up. It conserves your brain's cognitive health for decades. Into the future as you do it consistently. It's just win all the way across.

What is your background in terms of your academic qualifications and experiences that you've had that feed into everything that you know?

This sounds so pretentious. I can't believe I'm using this nomenclature, but I did my undergraduate work at the University of Michigan, where I met my fellow co founder of RP, nick Shaw. And that was in kinesiology, a Specifically, a subset of something called movement science. I then went on to do a master's in technically strength and conditioning, but exercise science at Appalachian State University. Then I went for one year to go work in New York City with nick as a personal trainer. At the end of that process, I realized that for my own personal vibe, I just didn't know enough, and I wanted to know more. And so I got accepted to a PhD program at East Tennessee State University under the great Mike Stone, who is probably one of the most well-published sports scientists of all time, definitely in the conversation for the greatest American sports scientist of all time. And I went to that PhD program, and that was in sport physiology. And the best way we had of summarizing what it is we were learning is the My thing we're learning best here is how to take good athletes and make them better.

I did three years of that. It sounds like a prison time. I did three years in ETSU, and that was the conclusion. I was a terminal degree. I got a PhD in sport physiology. And then I spent, oh, jeez, 10 years in various professorships, teaching and doing some research and all this other stuff. I'm no longer a college professor, mostly because there's only so many things you could do at the same time well. It was like, This YouTube thing is getting insane, so I'm just trying to pivot to that. But I'm still actively involved in research. Our company funds research. I still look at manuscripts. I still co-author, so I'm still involved in that capacity as well.

I want to start with a start. If someone's listening to this right now and they have walked into your, this is your practice. This is your hypertrophy practice, let's say, this table. They sit there and they say, I would like to gain more lean muscle mass and I'd like to lose some weight. I live a busy life. Where do we start? What's step one? I'm actually going to hazard a guess at step one and to see if I'm correct. But for me, step one is quite psychological because it's all well and good me having the tactics and strategies and the information. But if I don't have the motivation, then if it's going to matter anyway. So is step one psychological in some way?

Absolutely. My God, you should just be taking my job at this point.

No, but okay, I thought so. I thought that was... So what would you do for me to get me in the right psychological mindset?

I would even take a step back before that. Okay. The first thing we do is call the needs analysis in formal sports science. A needs analysis is, what do you want, specifically? Do you want bigger arms? How much muscle are you trying to gain? It's a very different conversation if someone weighs 150 pounds, and they're like, I want to be 155 but leaner, versus I weigh 150 pounds, and I want to be 200 100 ripped. Different timelines, different approaches, different trade offs.

Okay, give me the typical answer to that question.

Most people just open-ended, to be completely honest. I just want to get much leaner, and some of them will say, I also want to put on a lot of muscle. The muscle thing is a lot of times with females that just want the leaner part, but they understand in many cases that if they just jettison their muscle entirely, they end up looking more sick than healthy. But a lot of the males, leaner is important, but also getting super Jacked is important. But how jacked and how lean, that's the conversation is if they come in with totally open-ended concerns, it's like walking into a car dealership and be like, I want a car. You're going to have to be a little bit like, We'll sell you whatever. You're going to have to tell me a little bit more about what your use cases are, about what your budget is. So that's another big thing in a needs analysis is, how much time can you give to this? Because if someone says, I want to eventually be a professional bodybuilder, and I've got nothing but time in my week to do the thing, they're getting a very different plan than someone that's like, I just want to be able to see my man down there again and just not die soon.

And I have 2 hours a week to give you. Very different plan.

So I've got, let's say, I've got a couple of hours a week, so two, three hours a week that I could probably spare, maybe four. And I just want to get a bit leaner and I want to gain some muscle.

Yeah. I also ask, what have you been What are you doing so far? Tell me about your approach to fitness. The answer could be, I don't have one. I've never tried to do anything. Once we get a lot of that information, I don't want to say the plan writes itself, but almost, now we really, really, really have all the details to fill in the blanks.

Then from there, once you've done that needs analysis and you've understood the investment that they're willing to make, you understand what their goals are, you understand their current approach to fitness, what becomes step two? Again, I'm trying to embody the viewer here who's trying to change their life and get going for- Step two, oftentimes, just to keep it small, we definitely do nutrition, if you'd like.

So please cue me in for that. But I'll just use training as a quick example here. A big one is Do you go to a gym? Can you make it to a gym? Or are you going to be training at home? Because training at home is a bit of a different world. You can get amazing results at home, but we need to make sure you have the right equipment. And it's super minimal. Two 20-pound dumbbells. I like that you're looking over at the dumbbells.

Are those 20 kg dumbbells?

They're 20-pound dumbbells.

Is that what I need at home?

For many people, like adult males, bright, sprawy like yourself, 20-pound dumbbells at home will give you phenomenal overall result. What is that? Nine kg's or something? Oh, here we go. Your assistance are quite strong, by the way. Thank you. Do you fight crime in your spare time? I don't know.

Okay, so these are 20 pound dumbbells?

You're just showing off now.

But these are what I need at home to do a workout?

Yes, somewhere between 10 and 20 pounds, 10 for smaller, lighter females, 20 for larger, more strong males. Somewhere between that, Two of those dumbbells at home and a little bit of floor space can be the beginning of an absolutely revolutionary workout program.

Really? Yeah. Give me the starting position and the end position that I could get to just with these dumbbells at home.

If you properly control your diet and you haven't really lifted weights before, and you're, let's say, 30, 40, 50 years old, in a six-month time span, we can reliably get you to gain 5 to 10 pounds of muscle, which if you go to the store, what is that like? Let's say 2 to 5 kilos of muscle. You ever buy 2 to 5 kilos of meat at the store? That's a lot of meat. That's going on your body. We We can reliably get you to lose, oh, gee, 5 to 7 and a half kilos of fat in a six-month time frame just by being intelligent about your diet and doing two workouts per week at home with your dumbbells, and the workouts each take roughly 20 minutes.

So that's 40 minutes a week? Mm-hmm.

Oh, yeah. Now, that's if you're unaccustmed and unadjusted. If you have already, and that's why those intake questions are important, because if you're like, Look, I go to the gym six times a week. I spend two hours at the gym. Dumbbells can keep you in pretty good shape, but they're not going to elevate your shape very likely. At the very least, it'll be highly inefficient and incredibly discomforting for what you'd have to do with such dumbbells.

What is step three then? If we've got the equipment part figured out, and I guess the complicated element of that is some people have anxiety as it relates to going to the gym. I've got a lot of friends that because they're so inexperienced with weight lifting or the machines, they feel embarrassed to go to the gym. Well, at least that's what they tell me. Now, I don't know whether they're biasing themselves, but they tell me that they have gym anxiety. Yes. No, actually, I can relate. You walk into a gym, especially if I go to a bodybuilding gym, and I do look around and go, Okay, everyone here knows what they're doing more than I do.

That's already wrong, but we'll get to that in a bit.

Are they looking at me? Do they know that I don't know how this machine works? If I don't know how a machine works and there's no label to tell me, sometimes I just avoid the machine. If I'm in a bodybuilding gym because I go, No, I don't know how to do my wrist muscles. Yeah.

I just look like a doofus and everyone's making fun of me in their heads. That's what I think sometimes.

If I go to a really elite gym.

Yeah. So first of all, I think people's gym anxiety is absolutely a real thing. I can speak to that at length. The next step would be to say, Hey, listen, based on all the information we've collected on your limitations, desires, abilities, we've cultivated a plan for you. It could be a diet plan, just stick into the muscle growth stuff. Here's Here's your plan for your training. We actually have an app for this thing, where we would say, Okay, here's how you type in all your stuff in the app. The app will create a plan for you, and it'll tell you, Here's what to do for warming up. Here's, you pick a weight, it tells you how to pick your weights, and then it programs the rest of your two months of training for you. You fill in the, How do I feel? How am I recovering? It'll take care of everything else. And if you ever get confused, you click on the exercise and It opens up a video with an audio demonstration of how to do it and of someone, a professional bodybuilder, doing the thing. You're going, Oh, that's what bicep curls was.

Okay, got it. So now you have all the answers. And you don't have to have our app. We think it's nice. You don't have to have it. Just whatever plan you have, that's your little map of the Caribbean Sea with the Xs and the pirate ships. And you know exactly where to go. And it's you, your app or your map of how to train your program, and everyone else else, like in the Avengers movie, it just floats away. There's no one else. There's not even any other machines. It's you and the bicep curl machine and the hypertrophy app says, first set is 12 reps at 50 pounds. I take the Selectri stack, I go to 50, and I'm nice and warmed up, and I do 12 reps. And that's as far as you have to think about it. Comparisons, whatever anyone else thinks without a plan, oh, boy, are you second-guessing yourself? With a plan, you don't have to second-guess anything. Most of those people don't have a plan. They're just in there on vibes. They feel like my delts are going I'm on the road today if I do this. Like, thanks. Thanks for that intellectual opinion.

You said there's two types of effective training. One of them is hypertrophy.

Very good.

The other one is periodization.

So periodization is the scientifically-based organization of any training that you want. Hypertrophy training is a type of training. It's just muscle growth training. It's like a fancy science word for just getting more jacked, putting on muscle. That's the technical definition of hypertrophy. And when you train hypertrophy, you can do it by feel and more or less at random, and you'll get pretty good results in most cases. But to get your best results, you want that training to be periodized. Periodization is the scientific approach to how to organize your training to get roughly three things. Some of these are a bit more for athletes and not regular people. Get the best results that you can, peak at an appropriate time, abs for summer, and minimize injury risk. Taking all the science that we know, that plan that you've made because you did it in an evidence-based fashion, that is now what is considered a periodized plan. That's how those two concepts relate to each other.

What do I need to know about hypertrophy in order to be able to achieve it? Is there anything really foundational? Because I think everyone wants a bit of muscle growth. I think I spend too long in the gym. I think I could be much more efficient when I'm training. What would you recommend that I start thinking about as foundational principles when it comes to hypertrophy muscle growth?

What is specificity. It's the most important principle in all of sport training and exercise science is, what am I here for? What do I want? Because you can do a bunch of exercises in the gym and you're like, That was great. And someone's like, Are you getting the results you like? What I want is a bigger bicep. How many bicep exercises do you do? I think upright rows, maybe.

So I want a bigger bicep. If we just focus on me getting Steven Butler a bigger left bicep.

So specificity is telling yourself, Okay, I want bigger biceps and whatever X, Y, Z, other muscles. Then we move in to the principle of overload, which means You have to challenge yourself. If most of your sets, someone else watching them, can't tell if you're warming up or doing what's called a working set, like a real set, you have a problem. So towards the end of all of your sets, either the weights are slowing down or even if it's the same speed, to you, they feel perceptively harder. You do this, this, this, and in a couple of reps, you're like,. That's what you want. Every real working set should be challenging. You should be approaching every real set with just a teeny, teeny dose of trepidation. Like, Oh, boy, here we go. I'm going to have to try.

Once you have that- And a set is a group of repetitions? Correct. Set. If I do 10 repetitions, that's one set? One set, yeah.

So your sets have to be sufficiently heavy. Anything between roughly 5 reps per set and 30 reps per set, where the last few reps are getting close to you not being able to use good technique and lift the weights, check plus.

So there's not a perfect amount of repetitions to do?

There is. It's a trade secret, and I'd have to say it off camera to you. Okay. Mda to sign. Okay, we're off camera. All right, great. So it's 17. So there's just tons of tons of contextual nuance stuff. Some people, some of their muscles will respond better to sets of 5 to 10. Other folks, even the same person could have muscles in their body that really respond better to sets of 20 to 30 and everything in between. But generally, in the exercise science data, you'll have a group of people training for sets of roughly five reps, another group training for sets of roughly 30 reps, and their change in muscle growth over 8, 12, 16 weeks is statistically undifferentiable, which means if I delabel the groups and you don't know which one's which, you can't actually tell me who trained with higher reps or lower reps. For muscle growth, it's roughly the same.

That's so crazy. We're using the same weight? I'm guessing- No, different weights.

Different weights, yeah. We're using different weights. The weight that is challenging for five reps is much heavier than a weight that is challenging for 30.

Okay, so I do wonder this all the time when I go to the gym. I wonder if I should be doing, I don't know, 30 reps of 10 kg on my bicep, or I should be doing 10 reps of 20 kg.

They're both right answers. No wrong answers there.

They both have the the same chance of growing my muscles as long as the strain that I experience subjectively is difficult at the end of those cells. Correct. Okay, interesting.

Which is really good news because that's another thing you don't have to worry about.

Which means at home, I can get any range of weights versus having to get really big ones to grow my muscles.

As long as they're not so tiny that you're on rep number 45 and you're like, I could just do this for forever, or they're not so enormous that you're like, I can't really even do two reps of this. Anything between roughly five and roughly 30 reps, challenging is really good.

How How many sets and how often do I have to visit the gym to get this bicep to grow?

That answer depends on how much you've been doing before. But if you're new to the gym, two sessions a week with 2-3 sets per session for your biceps is something that's going to cause months and months and months of consistent progress. Really? Can you do more? Yes. Do you have to do as a beginner? No. Eventually, as a more advanced person, do you need to do more sets and perhaps more sessions to get consistently better results, yes. But for beginners who haven't been in the gym very much or at all, the minimal effective dose is profoundly small, which is why I can say things like, if you work out for 20 minutes twice a week, you're going to get great gains.

What if I go to the gym and I do six sets on my biceps and I just go to the gym once a week? Does the distance between the workout in a muscle group have an impact?

Yes. Once a week training gives you good results. But twice a week training for the same muscle gives you notably better results. Training three times a week versus twice, training four times a week versus three times, training five times a week versus four times is an exponentially de-escalating amount of impressive differences. So one time a week works. It'll get you results. Two times a week gets you like one and a half times the results. Like, way better, better. Three times a week is another little bit more result, still notable. Four times a week, you got to be training for a while to notice the difference between three and four. Four and five is contextual and nuanced, and I can't actually tell you that categorically five days a week is better than four. There are some things I would have to know about your plan and everything else to make that conclusion.

Really, I want to be aiming at twice a week per muscle group.

Twice is our minimum. Two to four times a week is what I say is the best overall recommendation per muscle group. If you train all of your muscles together at the same time, a whole body workout, which most people in the realm of just I'm busy and I can't train a lot, it would be all the major muscles of your body in the same session, twice or three times or four times a week. And that is an awesome beginner fitness plan.

What's going on in my muscles that's encouraging them and making them grow? And when are they growing? Is it when I go to bed at night? Do they grow the minute that I curl the dumbbell? What's actually going on? Because sometimes understanding what's actually going on inside helps me to think through and change my behavior.

Yeah. So the primary stimulus for muscle growth is there are molecular machines in your muscles, in your muscle cells, and they are designed to detect the presence of tension. And when your muscles generate tension, the molecular detector machines go, Oh, we got tension here. And they start saying to other parts of the cells like, Hey, let's get this muscle growth thing started. Start it. Not happening. Start it. It's a stimulus of muscle growth. There are a couple of other mechanisms which might/probably have an effect. A couple of them are metabolite sequestration, which is a very fancy way of saying the burn. You know at the end of a set, you're like, the metabolites, the byproducts of training, if they accumulate to high levels, it's been shown in tons of animal studies and a few human studies that mechanistically, they might also tell the molecular machinery that grows muscle for you, again, later to, Hey, get the muscle growth process. Another one is the pump. So you do a couple of sets of biceps, you're like, Oh, my God, what's going on here, baby? Flash it at some girl, she runs away as usual. And the actual cell swelling itself might play a causal mechanistic role in generating more muscle growth.

But we know it's probably at least 80% of the muscle growth anyone will see is because of those receptors for tension. Muscle growth, as soon as you leave the gym, is a negative because the gym is catabolic. It breaks your muscle. Actually, training breaks down more muscle than it builds. However, as you go home and you start eating food, protein, carbs, fats, and you have several meals per day, and you're resting, when the food's coming in, several hours after training begins, if you measure muscle growth consistently, which is really difficult to do. They don't do it super often. You have to keep people in a laboratory. You have to do radioactive tracers and measure all this weird stuff. Every couple of hours they measure, the amount of muscle growth that's going on in the biceps goes up and up and up and up. And it usually peaks about half a day to a day and a half after you lift, depending on how hard you went. If it's a pretty easy workout, it peaks a little sooner and drops off about a day or two later. If you train really crazy hard, it'll peak like a day, day and a half later, and then half a week later, it'll drop off back to baseline levels.

But it's this really smooth curve, and you're growing muscle at every single point under that curve. So when you say, is Is it while I'm sleeping? Is it while I'm eating? Is it while I'm resting? The answer is all of those, except it's not at the gym. You don't grow muscle at the gym. You give yourself a signal to grow muscle at the gym. And then what you do outside of the gym matters. So some people train really hard. They don't eat right. They don't eat enough protein. Their sleep is total, insert bad word here, and their stress levels are just totally psychotic. They train hard. And then week after week after week, they're like, I'm not seeing any results. But the results are actually created when you're resting, when you're sleeping, when you're eating nutritious food. They're stimulated in the workout, but that's just phase one. Phase two, the actual growth occurs outside of the gym, and it occurs not at any specific time point, like a magic window of two hours after the gym. That's when all the growth occurs. That's actually when it just starts to go up. It's four days afterwards.

If you train twice a week, you train on Monday, you're growing a lot of muscle on Monday night, Tuesday and Wednesday. Back towards the end of Wednesday, you're just not really growing much more muscle. You go back to the gym Thursday, you hit it hard again, you have that curve up. By Sunday, you're totally relaxed. During Sunday, you're not growing any muscle. Your body's really recovering a lot of that fatigue. Then by Monday, you're fresh as a pickle and you're ready to go at it again.

How long will it take me to lose the muscles that I've gained if I don't go back to the gym. Again, focusing on this bicep. I train it, I do two times a week, I get it nice and big. How long before it vanishes?

Great question. Two-part answer. Part one is within about two weeks of not training it, the first reduction in muscle that is detectable by modern machinery occurs. If you don't lift for two weeks, and we put you in an MRI scanner or a DEXA scanner, let's say a week and a half you don't lift, I can't tell. You're not really losing any muscle yet. You're just going insane. And so me personally, I'm addicted to lifting. So if I don't lift for a week, I'm like, Oh my God, all my muscle is gone. There is some intuitive of truth to that, because when you don't stress your muscles, when you do stress your muscles, they get a little bit inflamed and they bulge up a little bit. So when you're not training for half a week to a week, your muscles look smaller, like they've lost weight, but it's really just all water that they lost. You do one gym session thinking like, Oh, my God, my biceps are gone, a week and a half later. You do one session. At the end of that, you flex, and you're like, Oh, my God, I'm the biggest I've ever been.

I was just delusional that whole time because that stuff comes back super quick. After After about two weeks of not lifting, we start to lose muscle, but it happens really, really slowly and takes weeks and weeks and weeks and weeks. After several months of not lifting, you're going to look considerably smaller on your biceps, but probably not as small as when you started lifting because your muscles have a certain memory, if we can call it that.

Is that true? That's the memory thing. Very true.

Oh, yeah. And so a lot of times when you gain an initial amount of muscle, especially if you've been at it for years, it just never goes back to the same size as when you started It's just always going to be bigger until you reach your 80s or something like that. That being said, yes, you will notice reductions in size. So two weeks is the direct answer there, and it's going to take weeks and weeks and months and months to receipt. However, here's part two, and this is awesome news. Because of that muscle memory situation, however long it took you to gain the muscles initially, it's going to take you an order of magnitude, a factor of 10-ish or so less time to get it back. If you've been more jacked before, if you've had bigger muscles, they come back to their old size. If you lifted for eight months, you got a bigger bicep, and you stopped lifting for three months, it looks about the same as when you started. If you're really careful, it gets a little bit bigger, but really it's just back to square one. Most people think, Oh my God, another eight months just to get back to where I started?

Forget the gym. The truth is after roughly about a month, maybe as little as three weeks, you're going to have the same size biceps that you did in your peak. Because the degree to which your tissue grows, if it's been a certain size before, especially if it was notably bigger than normal and you held that around for a few months and a few years, it comes back in a way that is so fast. If you experience it yourself, it's like you don't believe that it's happening to you.

You gain back- Have they been able to scientifically test this?

Oh, yeah, all the time. Retraining studies, detraining, retraining. Oh, yeah. They've done studies where they purposefully lift for a while, and they stop lifting for a long time, and they see how long it takes to get back. There's one study I'm familiar with offhand that there's a group of people that trained consistently for multiple weeks, and there's another group of people that trained consistently for a few weeks, and then took two weeks completely off in the middle, and then just started retraining again for a few weeks later. Both groups had identically sized differences in muscle at the end of the study. And so we were like, Okay, so that group that trained consistently never took two weeks off. Could we say that they purposefully like, dunked two weeks of their time away for nothing? . Yeah. Your body goes right back into regaining old lost muscle so rapidly that this is such great news because look, let's say you lift it consistently most of the year. Holiday season comes up, winter holidays. You're not going to the gym as much, maybe not at all. Three weeks later of no gym, you look at yourself, you look a little smaller, deflated, and you're like, Oh, my God, I'm going to have to restart all this from scratch.

Nope. Two weeks later, you're in the best shape of your life again. If you left the gym for six months, one or two months later, you're in the best shape of your life again. That's how rapidly it comes back. It's really good news for anyone who hasn't been in the gym and is feeling guilty about it. Go back, get consistent again. You're just going to skyrocket.

That is very exciting. Because we always have, sometimes it's the trough, the couple of weeks off that makes us demotivated because that's crossed my mind before. Oh, my God, that took me three months to get there, and it's going to take me another three months to get back. But what about... If I'm training that bicep, how have I got to think about stretching and warming up? Before I get going with my training?

There are many ways to do it, but there's some research on this recently, actually. You don't need much. One of the simplest ways to warm up that we recommend at RP, and our app has it in the instructions, let's say you have your final weight already picked out. Like last week, you did 20 pound dumbbells for sets of 15. This week, it's sets of 16 with a 20 pound dumbbell. What you want to do is you want to do very lightweight, maybe the five pound dumbbells for a set of 12, just to get everything moving and grooving good technique, same technique you're going to use. 30 seconds of rest, a minute of rest. You You pick up the 10 or 15 pound dumbbells, you do a set of eight reps. It's a little bit more challenging. You feel your groove a little bit, but your body's already more warm, your nervous system is more active, your muscles are more pliable. You rest a minute After that, and then you'll pick up the weight you're actually using, the 20 pounders, and you'll do a set of 2-4 reps with them just to get the feel of that heavy weight that you're going to be doing, to acclimatize not just your muscles and your nervous system, but your psychology, to look, Okay, this is the business this weight that I'm going to be using.

So 12, 8, 4. Rest another 30 seconds. First working set of whatever, 16 reps, you're up. When you have multiple exercises for the same muscle group, you just need to do one set of four to eight reps in that middle weight range between zero and whatever you're going to do just to get the feel of the exercise because you're already generally warm in that area. One little warmup set, rest 30 seconds to a minute, and then hit your first set. If you're switching reaching which muscles you're using, like you were training chest, but then in the same session, you started training back, that first back exercise, 12, 8, 4, the weight goes up, up, the reps go down, down, down, just a little bit of time between, and then you hit your first work set and you're good to go. You don't have to do cardio before. You don't have to get on the treadmill. You can if you like it. You don't have to do some cardio warmup. You don't have to do any stretching or anything like that. You don't have to do any weird BOSU ball band around your neck, crazy potentiation exercises.

Just that little ramp up is basically in 98% of all cases, exactly in the only way you need to do.

What is a warmup? What is going on physiologically inside my muscle? Because we all just warm up, and I don't think anybody actually knows what's going on.

Yeah. So your muscle tissues, they have physical qualities that can be measured almost in a fluid dynamics terms, like viscosity and historesis and all that stuff. And so when you're very cold, A lot of times there's a frailty implied there. As you're warming up, you're sending blood to around the muscle. The muscle itself is literally becoming warmer. A lot of those tight structures, the proteins that are made of a stretching material, they loosen up a little bit. And that allows you to go through that full range of motion and training and not actually get hurt. And that's from the muscle perspective. You also get some chemical stuff that happens, and certain structures fill up with chemicals, certain structures, chemicals go down, and that gets you ready to perform super hard work. But that's part of the story. The other part is the nervous system, because your nervous system is also getting warmed up. And in tactical terms, it's called potentiation. When you just show up to the gym and you... Let's say we said, Look, okay, we reengineered your tendons when you were asleep, you're not going to get hurt. It's impossible for you to get hurt.

A car would have to hit you for you to your bicep off. You can just go and just hit the curves right away. You wouldn't get hurt, but it would feel really strange, and you wouldn't get four or five reps close to where you were supposed to be from last week because your nervous system was like, What the hell is going on? I'm supposed to be doing something, so you knew more of the nervous system. A part of that is literally the actual nervous system itself down to the cellular level is flushing all kinds of metabolites through, the connections are getting stronger. You're doing a little bit of mini rewiring of primary motor in your text to say, Oh, we're doing curves. This is how you execute this pattern. Another part is technical. Oh, this is the technique I'm going to do. Because if you just get in the muscle and just do stuff, imagine if I told you, Hey, here's a ball. Just go shoot some hoops, just hit that three-pointer shot, you're like, I need a couple shots to remind my body of what it's like to shoot the basketball. Same idea for lifting, you need to remind your body of what a curl motion is.

And if you remind it a couple of sets in a row, by the time you hit that real working set, that fourth set, your body is like, I know exactly what I'm going to do, which parts of the muscle I'm going to activate to contract, which other parts of other muscles I'm going to activate to relax and cocontract to make this whole thing happen.

What are the other common mistakes people make when they go to the gym or they start training or they start exercising? So there I've ticked off not stretching and taking on a heavy load too quickly, but also ramping up volumes and loads too fast. So that I've a strain before my body is ready for it. Are there any really other common obvious mistakes people make that inhibit their progress?

One of them is a failure to pay attention to good technique. There are some universal principles of what is good technique in the gym for muscle growth. One of them is, are you moving in a way that properly activates, stimulates that muscle to actually get it to grow? Because if you do If you do a curl that arcs up, it does a lot of bicep. If you do a curl that arcs back this way, because the bicep is being pulled one way and pulled the other way at the shoulder and the elbow, it ends up doing more of a stabilizing contraction than actually being the prime mover for the movement. So when you see people crawling at the gym and they're just doing this, you're like, yes, that is training your biceps. But if you just moved a little bit differently, it would be so much better. Here's another example, squatting, right? For your legs. If you squat really far back and not so far down, your glutes get hit, okay, your lower back and upper and midback is going to get hit a lot. But because there's not a huge change in your knee angle, you're not getting a ton of quad stimulus.

If you stay more upright and your heels and toes are on the ground and you allow your knees to go way forward beyond your toes as you stay upright and sink down really low so that your knee goes into one of these, oh my God, it's all quads all day long. So you want technique that is targeting the muscle. It's very similar rep to rep to rep, and it puts the muscle consistently through a range of motion that is in that deep painful length and stretch position. If you just have all those three, everything else we can say about your technique is just nuances and finer points. Those are really the big ones.

We talked about nutrition earlier as well. If I want to make my bicep grow and also drop off the weight around the bicep so you can see it even more, what should I be putting into my mouth?

The number one requisite for muscle growth is protein. Foods with lots of protein in them Ideally, should be consumed three to five times per day at roughly equidistant intervals. Breakfast, lunch, dinner, totally fine. Even better, breakfast, lunch, dinner, evening snack. The average person needs a little bit less than, let's say, a gram per pound of body weight per day of protein. Actually, considerably less. That's the top element and a cool aspirational thing to shoot for. If you weigh let's say 200 pounds, you should be consuming something like 150 to 200 grams of protein per day. And 150 for almost everyone's totally enough. But if you're real serious and hardcore and just want that insurance policy, 200 grams of protein per day. So then if you're eating four times a day, that's, oh, yeah, 30, 40, let's say 40 to 50 grams of protein per meal.

Can I eat too much protein and then it becomes fat or something?

Protein by itself, no. If your protein is so high that your carbs and fats are the same and you jack up your protein super high, but your carbs and fats stay where they are, your calories become excessive. That will cause fat gain over time. But if you're doing a diet where you get a ton of protein, but you dropped your carbs and fats and calories or at maintenance levels, you're not going to gain any fat. It's not bad for your kidneys. It's not bad for any other part of your body. Excessive protein as a health malady has been a myth the entire time. And that's one of those notions that people carry with them that too much protein is bad, right? Yes, if you've had kidney surgery, absolutely. Short of that, you're probably good to go. You'll fart a lot and people will hate you.

You mentioned 3-5 meals a day. A lot of people are now in this camp of fasting, an intermittent fasting, and not eating often. Is it possible to fast, but also to gain muscle mass in the way that you've described?

Yeah, totally. It just won't happen as an impressive rate. You have to make a trade-off for yourself. If you want most jacked, Steven, that you can be three to five meals a day, consistently spread, and almost to an individual, competitive bodybuilders eat that frequently and eat high protein.

How often do you eat?

I eat five times a day, four or five Five times a day, usually.

Do you eat before or after you train?

Both.

Okay, so before you train and after you train.

Do you eat different things? A lot of times I'll train early in the morning, and so I won't eat at all. I'll wake up and I'll have a protein and carb mix shake with my training. Totally optional. Super extra credit. May not do anything at all if you look at the literature, but I find it a little bit compelling to do a little bit of that. Then afterwards, I have my first post-workout meal, second meal, third meal, fourth meal, bedtime, wake up, do it again.

What do you take to get you Do you do pre-workout? No.

Why? No. I don't do any stimulants of any kind. Why? I'm just cooked up all the time naturally. If you give me stimulants, it's just going to go into the not-so-pleasant side of side effects. I'm just going to be like this and way too amped up, super high anxiety. My thoughts get to be like, I have less fluidity of thinking and stuff. It was just a lot of me, I guess. When I wake up in the morning, I don't need anything to get me going. I just go. A couple of warm-up sets later, I have all the energy I need. That's not everyone. So some green tea, some black coffee, or some pre-workout 30 minutes before the gym is great advice for a ton of people.

I feel like pre-workout can't be healthy if you're doing it five, six, seven times a week, because some of that stuff is so unbelievably strong. I've had it before where I've got literally heart palpitations when I've had a pre-workout. You talk about anxiety, that anxious feeling. It can't be healthy for people to be doing that frequently.

It seems to be quite fine. It seems to be quite fine. Now, at the extremes, and for some individuals, it's not ideal, but the upper limit dose of caffeine in milligrams per day, at which we can confidently say most people will experience the beginnings of health maladies, is a thousand milligrams. A cup of coffee has, depending on which cup, 50 to 100. Now, some pre-workouts have 250 milligrams of caffeine, caffeine. Some have 500. Last I checked, Roni Coleman's pre-workout has 550 mg of caffeine per scoop or per serving. So that's a lot. If I took 550 mg of caffeine, you Don't take me to the gym. Just take me right to the hospital. Put me in the psychiatric ward. Thirty-six hours later, I'll be okay. But for some people to get so accustomed to high doses of caffeine that is supposed not unhealthy for them to consume, and also they feel quite fine. So I would say start Start with as little as you need to get you going. And if you need to titrate and work out from there, that's a good thing. The other thing I would say is I would have a compelling case for pre-workout or stimulant.

If I ask you, Hey, how much energy do you typically have at the gym? They're like, Oh, that's super great. And they're like, Should I take pre-workout? I'd be like, No, there's no compelling case for that at all. If you're like, I wake up in the morning, some days I just don't get a ton of sleep, and I need something to get me going, not every day, but sometimes I'll be like, Hey, consider green coffee, some diet soda, or all the way up to a pre-workout if you need it. But some people take it as a religious thing, as a habit, as a ritual. And it's like, dude, you're training your forearms and biceps for 20 minutes total at 9:00 PM. You do not need three scoops of pre-workout for that. I don't even know where it's going at that point. So some people get a little crazy with the pre-workouts. At the end of the world, it's at best needless.

What's your stance on the whole idea of calories in, calories out? A lot of people just focus on that as their script to lose body weight, lose body fat, and gain muscle. Is that a useful frame to use? Why does so many people fail at it, if it is a useful frame?

Most people fail at it because they don't consider both the calories in and calories outside of the equation. And a lot of people fail because they're bad at estimating food amounts and calories. Someone will say a teaspoon of peanut butter. Steven, have you ever actually seen a teaspoon measuring cup? It does not look like mom's spoon where she takes the peanut butter and goes,. It's like four tablespoons. But I'm eating the calories, blah, blah, blah. Every time you take people into what's called a metabolic ward, which is a study center where you're not allowed to have visitors that bring you food, the workers only give you the food that you need, and all of your exercise and your output is controlled and monitored, and so is your intake. No one has ever violated laws of thermodynamics. We give you a certain number of calories, and we expect you to lose a certain number of weight. There's a variance about that, but you're going to lose the weight that roughly we predict. If we account for all variables, you're going to lose almost exactly the weight that we predict. So calories in, calories out is incontrovertible.

In among 90 something %, 98 % of people who do research in the field and are scientifically literate and educated, calories in, calories out is It's not controversial. It never has been. There are some people who say, Well, a calorie counting didn't work for me. That's probably because you did it wrong, or you weren't even concerned about how much protein you're taking in or how many carbs, how many fat. There are other details that matter. If you say, I need a V8 engine in a car, that's all that matters. Okay, well, there's no steering wheel, there's no pedals. Cool. Okay, I need those things, too. So calories in, calories out is the very core because without an engine, you're not going anywhere. But what types of foods you're eating matters a little bit. Are you getting enough protein, carbs, fats? That matters a bit, too. So people like to just bash calorie balance and calories in, calories out. Well, it's totally myth. It doesn't work. No, it works great. It's just not always enough to get you in the best shape you can. But if you do it right, as far as net balance weight gain or weight loss, calories in, calories out is actually the only thing that matters.

Tissue-wise, is that gain mostly muscle or mostly fat? Is the loss mostly muscle, mostly fat? That has not It's not so much to do with calories. It has much more to do with proteins, carbs, fats, the quality of food you're eating, nutrient timing, and all the rest of it. So calories in, calories out is amazing, super explanatory, critical, but it's just not the whole picture.

And that's really it, I guess, because so many people say They've heard about calories in, calories out, but they fail at maintaining it. Now, that's really about motivation and the psychology of doing such a thing. Some people have said to me that our bodies want to defend our weight. If we start eating less, we'll become a little bit more hungry. If we go for a run after the run or after a physical exertion, our body will try and make up for it because it's programmed to try and defend its weight because its weight correlates to our ability to survive. Why do people fail at it? One of the reasons you said is because they're not actually measuring the calories correctly, but the psychological reasons that it hasn't worked for some people. Can you think of many? Because when people talk about calories in calories out, if you look at the comment sections on those videos, people say, I've tried this and it didn't work. Okay.

So first of all, I typically don't look at comment sections of videos because comment section is not representative of the population. It's not representative of the people that watch your videos. It's not representative of the hardcore demographic that watches your videos. So just as a statistical artifact, every single claim by people against calorie balance in that comment section could be true for them, but they represent 1% of the population. So 99% of people, it works just fine. For 1%, they get into some trouble. Usually that trouble is they They didn't count calories properly. They didn't account for macronutrient profile, proteins, carbs, fats, they didn't account for nutrient timing or the kinds of foods that they're doing and so on and so forth. And another one is, like you said, sustainability. How long do I have to count calories for in my life for me to get the body that I want and keep it? Is sure shit not going to be forever. So what I'll do is I'll count calories for a few months, I'll lose a lot of weight. Then I'll go back to eating on vibes and the weight comes right back. Absolutely.

So better than just counting calories, What we want to do is instill people with good eating habits. If you learn how to construct meals made of lean proteins, veggies, fruits, whole grains, healthy fats, you know roughly how to see how much food you need and how much food looks, at least like it's what you eat per day. If you're checking your You're getting your body weight relatively often and when your body weight starts to get a little higher, you clean up your diet a little bit. And when your body weight is nice and low, a couple of cheap meals, a couple of kebabs, burgers and stuff, that's all good. If you do that and you have those healthy habits, whatever weight you lost on calorie restriction, You can maintain with very, very little work, not counting a damn thing just on good habits. But if you count on calories, you do some weird diet where you only eat like two for an orange, slices and protein shakes or something. Yeah, the calorie counting will get you wherever you need to go. But then afterwards, the diet's over and you're like, Now what do I do?

Good luck, going out in the world and eating the same diet that got you fat in the first place. That's the big kicker.

People might say it takes too much time to count calories. It leads to an unhealthy relationship with food. I think there's a big movement at the moment to try and get calories off menus because it's said to increase the amount of people that have eating disorders and things like that. Is that a conversation worth entertaining in this regard? Sure.

Very few people will develop eating disorders based on increases in information they are presented. I would actually call that eating order instead of eating disorder. Most people who get eating disorders are highly at risk genetically and with a few other social circumstances. Eating disorders are, for example, the most deleterious eating disorders, anorexia nervosa, seen not exclusively, but almost exclusively in females of reproductive age. They ain't calories on a menu doing that. That's something you bring into the table, usually because you have the genetic proclivity for it. And additionally, because you've been in a social and cultural circumstance where not only were you the wrong person to get ridiculed for your weight, but also a lot of people ridiculed you for your weight. And Then you go all careening off on this path where no one can even tell you you're super skinny anymore because you don't believe it. So the idea that you're going to see much higher prevalence globally in eating disorders from putting menu calorie labels on things is true by this much at the margins, and it's just largely not the case.

Adjacent to that is this idea of muscle dysmorphia, which affects a lot of people, but specifically men, roughly 87% of men that are between 15 to 32 years old that experience muscle dysmorphia, which is what?

Muscle dysmorphia, generally, is for whatever level of jacked that you are, you think you are considerably less jacked, both in reference to yourself and your own desires and in reference to an ethereal make-belief-comparator population in your head. So if you were to ask me, Hey, Mike, do you feel jacked? And I'm like, No. You're like, Oh, not good. Not a good sign. Clearly, he's jacked. And then you can ask me, Mike, Compared to other 40-year-old Ashkanazi Jewish men, how jacked are you? And if I'm like, I'm probably like, Bottom 50 % for sure, probably bottom 25, you'd be like, Okay, he's mentally ill. Take him away. That is high-level muscle dysmorphia, a disassociation from any objective reality about how much muscle you actually have.

Do people overestimate or underestimate their appearance as it relates to their muscles?

Dysmorphia is almost always cataloged as an underestimation.

But from your experience working with people, do people think they're more jacked than they actually are?

It really depends on the individual. Most people that are in gym culture that are very invested, if you catch them on their not so great days, they think they're substantially less jacked than they really are. If you tease it apart via conversation, they'll end up being like, Yeah, no, I know I'm jacked, but I'm just saying... And then it's aspirational, for my goals, I'm not as jacked as I would like to be.

It's interesting because we typically think of women think stereotypically in society as caring more about their body image. But I've read a lot of stats lately that suggests men care equally about their body image, but just in slightly different ways, and about the correlation between their perception their body image and their own mental health and the link between the two. Sure. Do you see a lot of that? Do you see this link between mental health and male body image?

Yes. A huge proportion of psychological proclivities are genetic. The others are very individually acquired. They change through time. It's not as easy as saying upbringing or family environment. So the one consistent thing about how you relate to the world and your own thoughts is genetics. And a lot of the traits tend to aggregate together. So So it is true to say on a spectrum, very nuanced, that some people aggregate a lot of negative psychological traits, and some people aggregate a lot of positive. And they're absolutely people. Everyone's a mixed bag somewhere in between, but there's a little bit of this I don't want to use a term for another mental, a bipolarity to the distribution. And so a lot of people that are generally neurotic, they feel consistently unsafe and unsure of themselves, are going to be also the type of people that when they more jacked through lifting, they're still not going to believe that they're as jacked and accomplished and awesome and alpha male as they really are, because they're always like, to use the old Jewish joke, stereotypically, I'm never going to be big. And it's like, you're already big. Like, I don't know.

It could get worse tomorrow. And a lot of people just bring that to the table. And so when you get neurotic people jacked, they don't think they're that jacked. They're always like, Oh, my God, it's always going to end. But if you take not neurotic people and make them jacked, one week of lifting into those people, they're like, Dude, I'm like, Do you think I should turn pro in bodybuilding? They're like, Get out of here. You're just overconfident. So it really depends on who's doing the thing. Now, cultural stuff, social, who's in your circle. I'll give you a good example. I have a lot of my closest friends have no relation to fitness whatsoever. A bunch of them are actually neuroscientists, just randomly people I knew in college that ended up being my friends for life. And so when they assess their muscularity relative to myself and my bodybuilder friends, they're like, I'm in terrible shape and I'm not remotely jacked. And they have this weird comparator population that I always remind them like, Dude, not everyone looks like this. They go to the store, they go to school, they go to the bank, and they're like, Oh, crap, you're right.

I'm actually the most jacked person at the bank. It's just not like gold's gym where everyone's enormous. So if you happen to be in an environment, let's say you're a university student and you go to the university gym and there's lots of jacked people there and you're there all the time trying to do your best, you may, if you're neurotic to begin with, more neurotic, start to develop a sense that you're just not near Clearly as jacked as you should be or could be or whatever. But if you hang out at an old people home with your grandma and grandpa all the time, you're going to feel like Superman all the time because holy shit, you're like, you can do real things and move furniture around.

And so then go back to the point about weight loss. If I'm trying to lose weight, what are the What are the biggest myths around weight loss that hold people back and inhibit them?

One is you have to be perfect. If I'm on my diet, I'm good. If I'm off my diet, not only am I bad, but as soon as I'm off my diet, I have sinned, and there is no solace for me. A lot of people have that falling off the bandwagon thing where they'll eat clean food, whatever that means, diet food for weeks and weeks and weeks. They have one kebab, they have one cheeseburger, and they're like, back it. That's it, man. I'm done dieting. I'm not a good person anymore. It's like that whole dichotomizing and a religious approach, that hurts a lot of people. Because in reality, if you just eat a cheeseburger, your body's like, Oh, sweet. I got a little bit more I have my carbohydrates stored in the muscle. I recovered a little bit more. My diet fatigue is actually a little lower because you fed me some food. Tomorrow, I'm back on the diet. I'm making even better gains than if I didn't have that cheeseburger. I was so exhausted. And so a lot of people have that approach completely backwards, and they're like, I'm either good or I'm bad. And that's really tough.

Another one is people think that the approach to lose weight is the same as the approach to maintain it. This is really, really, really nasty because my wife is a board-certified family med, sports med doctor, and she does a lot of work, international Olympic teams, all that stuff. And she is looking at these formal recommendations from the medical literature, and it's like, here's the diet you need to lose weight. And then she followed up with some of the professionals, and she's like, And so what about maintenance? And they're like, Yep. What do you mean, yep? What are you talking about? That's not the conversation. So people think, okay, I'm going to clean up my diet. No more ice cream, no more crisps, no more Cheetos. I'm going to eat super healthy. And then when I get to the weight that I want, I eat continuously super healthy. I never have ice cream again. What bizarre world is it? And so they'll flop back to the other one. Well, they'll try for a few months after they've gotten to the weight they like to just eat completely super healthy, clean, everything like that. They lose a little bit more weight.

They're exhausted, they're tired, their food focus is driving them nuts. They'll eat some ice cream and they'll go, I'm a sinner. And then ice cream, ice cream, cheeseburger, cheeseburger. Up they go, and then they regain all the weight. So a huge myth is the fact that, yeah, when you're losing weight, you got to pay a little bit more attention to what you eat. But once you've gotten to that weight, you both need some time. Roughly every three months that you diet hard to lose weight, you should be taking about at least two months at maintenance, just maintaining it. So if you wait 100 kilos, now you're down to 90, after three months, for about two or three months, just stay at 90. Eat mostly the healthy stuff that you were by throwing a little junk in there. Maintenance, again, is much easier than losing. When physiologically and psychologically, your diet fatigue comes down after those two or three months, you're able, if you'd like, to start dieting really hard again to get to that next goal that you have Or you just live in balance for the rest. But if we tell you, here's your diet to make you lean and healthy, and you're like, Okay, how long do I have to do this?

And the doctor is like, Forever? What am I supposed to do? I'm never allowed to have Teremisu after dinner ever again. I'm like, Well, I'm probably not, too. That's terrible. Terrible advice. And not only do medical people too often say that, most people have that in their heads, and it's a very, very untenable situation.

One of the big Swiss narratives that I was exposed to for most of my life about weight loss is that 80% of its diet What do you think about those ratios? How much of weight loss is determined by diet versus exercise?

Diet has a bigger effect than exercise. As a heuristic, I'm very comfortable with 80/20. There are a couple of reasons for that. One is there's the constrained energy hypothesis. It's also called Ponzer's Paradox, based on Hermann Ponzer's work and physical methodology. Basically, they realized that The amount of physical activity that humans can do has a range. But if you try to get people to double their physical activity, you say, I'm not going to change my diet. I'm going to work out twice as much as the next guy. Your body becomes so fatigued so rapidly, and your metabolism adjusts itself, your physical activity that's not planned exercise, like how much do you get up when someone calls you, are you still on the couch talking to them, or how much do you get up and walk around your kitchen a bunch? Your body makes all these adjustments So if you try to really outwork a bad diet, it doesn't work. And usually, you just come back to the same physical activity because you're too exhausted to continue, and then you fail. Whereas with diet, you can make some dietary changes, principle-based, like Stop eating junk food every day and just eat two pieces of junk food on Friday and two pieces of junk food on Saturday.

Just that alone is sustainable. Your body, as long as these are filling foods, a lot of veggies, fruits, whole grains, lean meats, you're not hungry. You're just like, damn it, I want a bag of chips. That's not a reason. That is mostly psychological, it's not physiological. And thus dieting is just able to take bigger chunks out of your calorie balance equation without completely destroying it. That has limits as well. You can't diet forever, so you have to take it in chunks. Another thing is this, in order to burn a lot of calories, to lose a lot of weight, you got to do some serious work. The Average personal burn, something like 100 to 150 calories per mile run. Oh my God. You start thinking about it like a donut has 300 calories. How fast, Steven, can you eat a donut if I time you? Five seconds. No problem. Boom. You're going to run three miles after each donut? No. It's insane. So taking your diet, cleaning it up, reducing the junk, reducing the calories is not that hard. But if you try to fight off the nasty extra junk food calories you're taking in with exercise, it's like a three to one fight.

You eat two donuts at your work function after work, you got six miles to run that day. Nobody doing that. And that's why diet is such a huge It's so easy to do damage with it, and it's much easier to take control of it versus with exercise, the boundary layers are just smaller. What you would have to do to fight the bad diet is just grotesquely large and outside of those boundary layers.

I think it's a lot because I think people typically assume that the way to lose weight is to go do a run.

Yeah.

That's typically... You'll see people in the gym, and if you ask someone why they're on the running machine, they'll probably say, I'm trying to lose some weight. Yeah.

It helps a little bit. But if you run and you burn 200 calories extra per day, three days per week, then it's 600 extra calories you're burning through the week. That's good stuff. You can lose some decent weight like that.

Are you just going to be more hungry, though, afterwards?

Typically, exercise does not dependably increase your hunger in most people. Depending on the context in the individual, it's not a dependable thing to say that doing more exercise necessarily makes you more hungry, which is cool because usually you're not really any more hungry. If you stick consistently exercise, but you control your diet, you're good to go.

However- Is there a psychological component to that where because I've done the run, I now feel like I deserve it?

Oh, yeah, that's huge. And some people do have a hunger response. But what you put in your body after that could be really healthy stuff that doesn't have a ton of calories is really filling, or it could be like, We're done running pizza and beer, and then that's really bad news. But real quick, so let's say you're burning 600 calories extra per week by running two miles at a time or whatever, you run an extra four miles per week, right? 600 calories per week. What is that? Well, to burn a pound of body fat, you need to get 3,500 calories per week out of your diet or do 3,500 extra calories of activity per week. 600 is a drop in the Don't get to that. You'll never notice. I mean, yeah, after a year, you'll lose like 2 or 3 pounds or 5 pounds or whatever. Nobody thinks in terms like that. But if they were to simply alter their diet and keep training to keep the calorie burn at moderate to high level, but take food out of their diet, especially through junk food, the total calorie sink deficit they can make for themselves is now in the hundreds of calories per day.

Now you're losing a pound of fat every week. Now you're having big results.

Is there a preference between doing cardio or strength as it relates to long term weight loss? Because I'm thinking if I've got more muscles, then surely my body is going to burn more calories.

Just by a small margin. Oh, really? Almost unnoticeable.

So So your body versus my body, you're not burning more calories.

How much do you weigh?

I don't even know it in pounds. It's about 92 kilograms.

Okay, solid. So I currently weigh about 98 kilograms.

202 pounds.

202. So I weigh like 216 to 220 right now.

So we're not too far off yet.

Not too far off. So even though I have considerably more muscle-In your opinion. In my very bias, No dysmorphia here. I would be burning a teeny bit more fat or more calories per day because of my higher muscle mass, but it's mostly my absolutely higher weight. So for example, the people in the world that burn the most calories and need the most calories to sustain their body weight are the fattest people in the world. That lady that weighs 800, 900, 1,000 pounds, just to keep her the same size, it's 15,000 calories a day. If it was all muscle and no fat, somehow she was 1,000 of muscle, which would be sweet to look at, she would be burning maybe 16,000 calories per day instead of 15. And probably even that's an exaggeration. Muscle mass doesn't help you burn tons of calories. That's not what it's there for. It is incredibly good for your health. It is incredibly good for how you look. Those things by itself make muscle mass an awesome thing to do. But it is neither true to say that cardio, reliably, over the long term, burns lots of weight off. And it is not true to say that gaining lots of muscle burns lots of weight off.

What is really critical is, do you have a well-controlled, nutritious diet? And do you have an average, moderate to high level of daily physical activity, dancing and swimming and running and having fun and chasing your kids. If you're on the higher end of activity, not psychotically high to where you get super tired, just not being a total slouch and making sure you're aware of your body when you're diet, that's what really pays these massive dividends in long term weight control. It's not like, well, if I put on a ton of muscle, that's great for everything else. It makes you super healthy. It makes you look really awesome. It gives you the ability to, I don't know, do real world stuff, defend yourself, things like that. That's what muscle is there for. It's not the greatest calorie sink in the world. I wish it was. I'd be cheeseburger right now.

In terms of supplements, are there any supplements you suggest that I take if my goal is to lose weight, but also to gain muscle mass for the average person?

No.

There's no supplements?

I mean- Creatine? Creatine will not help with weight loss. For most people, it'll temporarily gain you about 2 kilos of body weight because it attracts body water into the muscle. It's a cool look because I'm on creatine right now. Can you tell? Yeah, really? All right. Creatine doesn't help you lose weight in any meaningful extent. I'm aware of no over-the-counter supplements that simultaneously help you burn and gain muscle. There are supplements that are not over the counter that do that quite well.

What if I'm just trying to gain muscle then? What supplements would you recommend the average person to be taking, really regardless of, I guess, goals. If their goal is to be a little bit more lean with their muscle mass, if their goal is to build muscle, is it different types of supplements you'd suggest?

Creatine works to build muscle. It's got awesome cognitive benefits. It's just healthy for you and it's great. So 5 grams per day for most people of creatine monohydrate, super awesome.

Have you I used to load creatine?

I remember when I was shopping. I used to load creatine. That's basically a corporate scam that's just trying to get you to consume more creatine so you buy more. Really? Yeah. If you load your creatine, which is taking 20 grams per day for a few days, you get to intramuscular creatine stores that are optimal in four or five days. If you don't load creatine, you get there in seven to 10 days. Because you're taking creatine either for months or for life, it's just a moot point. So creatine Loading is a gigantic waste of time in almost every case. Okay. So creatine works. Whey protein, Caesium protein, can be an excellent way to conveniently get protein. So they're more like foods rather than supplements. Those are totally cool, but not mandatory. If you talk to me like you are now for just several hours at a time, let's say we're sitting on a plane together and you're like, I'm just a guy who's trying to get a little bit more this, a little bit more that, what supplements do I need to take? Is the wrong time to ask that. The time to ask that is like, I want to take a run at a natural bodybuilding show.

What supplements do I need? Okay, then they pay some dividends that are worth noting. But supplements are just not in the conversation for important things that health-conscious people should have, even in their top 10 of important things that you do. The top 10 important things are getting adequate sleep, managing your stress really well, consistently lifting weights, consistently doing a high level of physical activity, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Those are the big rocks, not supplements. Supplements are insanely overrated as a general rule.

This next challenge is offered in partnership with Whoop. Does the idea of waking up with more energy, a clearer mind, and a feeling of control appeal to you? If it does, I want you to join me this sober October. I stopped drinking a while ago now, and it was largely because of Whoop. Time and time again, I watched my heart rate variability dropped to 40 after having a drink, even one or two glasses of wine, when it would otherwise sit nearer to 150. The only other times it would drop this low was when I was sick or when I was stressed. Information enables us to make more informed choices, and seeing this led me to make a change in my life. If you're a member of Whoop, look out for Whoop's Sober October challenge in the app. If you haven't joined yet, head over to join. Joinjoinjoin. Woup. Com/ceo to start your free trial. That's join. Whoop. Com/ceo. And get ready for your life to change. Everything I am, every goal I have, every company I founded, this podcast all rests on this tectonic plate I didn't even know existed, which is my health. You remove my health, you remove everything I have.

You remove my dog, I still have myself. You remove my girlfriend, I still have myself. But if you remove my health, I lose everything. So it has to be my first priority. It has to be number one. And I've orientated my life around that. One area of my health that people often overlook is my oral health. And a game changer for my routine has been Colgate Total, who are a sponsor of this podcast. Unlike ordinary toothpaste that only clean, Colgate Colgate Total really does provide superior 24 hour protection for your whole mouth. Colgate is the number one brand recommended by dentists. So join me in prioritizing your oral health. To learn more about Colgate Total's superior science, visit the link in the episode description below. What about steroids?

They're great. What? Am I allowed to say that?

What are steroids? And you said you take steroids. Do you take steroids all the time? And what is the impact? Say if you weren't taking steroids, how different would you look?

I know this because I used to not take steroids. And when I wasn't taking steroids, I weighed about at a body fat similar to this, I would have to weigh probably 180 to 190 pounds, more like 180 in this body fat level. I currently weigh 216 pounds because I'm on a moderate amount of steroids. A few weeks ago, actually earlier last week, I was on higher amounts of steroids, and with this same level of body fat, I weighed 227 pounds. So we're talking about 30, 40 pounds of muscle tissue difference between steroids and not steroids.

Have you got a picture of before and after? Before when you didn't use steroids and you trained and then after?

Yeah, it's got to be somewhere.

We'll try and get it just for visual content.

Sure.

You said they're great.

I was kidding. They're great for putting on muscle if you want to jettison your long term health and longevity to some extent, yes. And your current psychological stuff.

If someone that's never done it, give me a window into... What do you do? Do you inject it somewhere?

You can take steroids orally through pills, or you can inject it into muscle. Usually, you would inject it into your quads. A lot of people do shoulders, and some people, if they're flexible enough, do their glutes.

How quickly do you notice a difference? How big is the difference? Just to give me your- As far as jackness is concerned? Yeah. If I start taking steroids now, How long would it be before I noticed a difference and how extreme would the difference be in your opinion?

Visually, after a few months, you would be like, Oh, wow. Okay, this is some other shit. After a week or two, you'd be like, I don't know. My workouts feel pretty good. Psychologically, If you're especially introspective and perceptive and you're sensitive to the psychological side effects, which I'm greatly sensitive to, I notice in 30 minutes of taking steroids.

If I did the same exact workout but took steroids, would I get different results or would I have to ramp up the workout that I'm doing to see those different results?

Both. If you have the same workout and you take plenty of steroids, you can literally double your muscle gain from that workout. If If you understand that steroids also allow you to recover faster and better and more completely, you can take your workout and magnify it more sets, et cetera, more sessions per week, and then you would grow two and a half times as much muscle.

Sounds exciting, but there's always a downside for these things in life, isn't there?

There are a few downsides, yes.

What are the downsides that no one's talking about?

That no one's talking about. So there's cosmetic downsides. You get an increase in body hair growth. This is especially profounder for female, but if you're a male, that's the thing. I have hair that grows on my ears. I have hair that grows on the outside of my nose. I have to shave the front of my nose. Now, a lot of that's just being a Russian Jew, and hair just grows out of our eyeballs, but shit happens. You get pimples, you get stuff like that. Over the longer term, you get a substantially increased risk of heart disease. If you're smart, you take blood pressure drugs to counteract the blood pressure increase. If you're dumb, you take it on the chin and you have a high probability, much higher of kidney failure later in your and losing your limbs and your vision and all that good stuff that comes with that. There is an increased probability or severity of cancer. Steroids increase the probability of damn near every disease, central systemic disease that you can have. But that usually happens much later. And so while you're on them, you deal with the cosmetic side effects, increased probability of balding, and the psychological side effects, which are highly unpleasant.

I can get into in a bit. If you're a teenager, there's an entire class steroids that close your growth plates early. So if you're under the age of definitely 22 as a male and you take steroids, there's a very good chance you will never reach the adult height you were supposed to reach if you just let nature do the thing. So when teenagers take steroids, it's almost always categorically a super terrible idea. Also, they're not intelligent enough yet. Some teachers are very smart. They're not wise enough yet to be able to make that trade-off appropriately. And so that's a huge different topic. But the psychological side effects are a lot of the times the things that are the approximately most displeasing part of taking steroids. Some people like them, but they're also a mixed bag.

Tell me about the Before we get onto the psychological effects, what about libido? Because I've heard all kinds of things. I've heard it shrinks your balls, your willy.

Something like half of all people will experience testicular shrinkage while using steroids. Your boy got lucky. My shit's all the same A lot of people, roughly half, will experience a decrease in ejaculate volume and a profound decrease in fertility. That does not mean you're not infertile. I know many people. I know many people's children that were fathered when the people were on steroids. So some people are like, I'm on gear. I could just bang away and nothing happens. That's not true. Steroids have never been shown to change the size of your willy. There is no mechanism by which really they can do that. So that's not a problem. But steroids, depending on the steroids you take, depending on your own individual biology, depending on the ancillary drugs that you take along with it, steroids can either have no real effect on your libido, have a profoundly upregulating effect on libido, or hunger, you would not believe. For other people, you get an increase in libido, but some steroids, for example, decadurabolin, and some people, it's a type of steroid. Radically, it escalates your libido. You turn in just hungry. At the same time, gives you, in many cases, dependable inability to sustain an erection.

So erectile dysfunction risk goes up a lot. That's a real big problem because you want it, but it's not around for the picking there. So there's all that stuff plays a huge role. And a lot of the other side effects are increases in anxiety, increases in aggression, increases in disagreeableness and probability of confrontation. Steroids have been shown decently well. This isn't super confirmed to at least, approximately, while you're taking them, substantially reduce your fluid intelligence. And they may in the long term, reduce your overall intelligence, but it seems that if you stop taking them, you get most, if not all of that back, but maybe not all of it. So they do make you dumber as a general heuristic. That's probably true.

Of those psychological implications, which ones have you suffered with the most?

Decrease in fluid intelligence, for sure. Radical increases in anxiety, radical increases in aggression. I pride myself on never losing my cool. I've never screamed at anyone. I've never gotten physical with anyone. But the ideas in my head that tell me to do things tell me to do unspeakable things.

What?

They're unspeakable. I'd have to them. You really want to know? I'm also fucking weird, so just remember that. We were all a bit weird. Most people probably don't have this severity, but I'll read a comment on social media, directed at me, I guess, about me. It's from nameless faceless profile. I begin to fantasize about what it would be like and how much sublime pleasure I would receive in hurting that person at a deep physical and emotional level, badly. Herding them in such a way that they're never going to walk right again, and they're always going to remember me and how they dare to cross me. Do you know what honor culture is?

No.

The idea that in the hood, you step on someone's a gang member's Nike's, and he just blasts you away and goes to jail for 20 years. Over what? Steroids, the honor culture comes from maleness. It comes from testosterone and other brain structures, of course. But the more testosterone and steroids are all testosterone-like molecules, if you have 10 times the testosterone-like action affecting your brain, your proclivity to falling into honor culture-like behavioral patterns and thought patterns increases to an enormous extent. You tend to take things that are not meant in any poor way as affronts. If they're actually meant as affronts, you to catastrophize them in your head. And this is the thing. I'll be brushing my teeth in the morning in the shower and thinking about people in my life that have wronged me. I've never been wronged in a real serious way. And I'll just be like, Those motherfuckers kinds of uncontrollable fantasies of rage and aggression and righteous anger and revenge. I hate that. As a philosophical-minded person, I just want to hug everyone in the world, Right now, I'm on not so high levels of steroids. I'm just, man, I make jokes with every...

I'll start conversations with random people on the street, no problem. And so when these thoughts consistently enter my mind on higher doses, I'm just like, Why? And I'm never like, I should be feeling like this. I'm like, this is really annoying and really terrible.

If there are all of these physiological and psychological implications, which you said it basically increases your chances with all of the major diseases, from cardiovascular diseases to cancer, to other diseases, but then also there's this ongoing psychological consequence of taking steroids, what's the point?

That's a good question. Recently, I've taken a probably several year back seat away from competitive bodybuilding, precisely because I have a lot of really good things going on in my life, and I'm going to need my brain and my more fluid civility to deal with them best, and for a couple of other reasons. So right now is an interesting time to ask me why do it because I'm winding that down big time. But the real reason One of the reasons that I started steroids is I was drug free for a long time, and I was starting to become an educator in fitness and a promulgator of opinion. And a lot of the people who are in the industry at the time, this This is not as true anymore. Now, drug-free bodybuilding and fitness is exploding, which is a beautiful, wonderful thing. But back when nick and I came up, to be relevant in the fitness industry, you had to be super, super, Jackson, super, super lean. It's nothing we were going to accomplish drug free. So we were like, This is where the road leads to being taken seriously as a thinker in the space.

Let's do it. Another thing is, I really like being, or at least for a long time, liked being enormous and ripped. Why? Just like a... You ever see how a four-year-old looks at a garbage truck or a tank or an airplane? Just that. Why? It's as simple as that. Biology, and I'm at the extreme end of masculinity brain-wise to begin with. And so you see a movie where the Hulk rips off an airplane wing and throws it. Some people be like, whoa. Some people are like, I hate this movie. And some people are like, Oh, my God, I want to just be that. That whole thing. Why? I want that. It just feels good.

But you know why? Because have you got any hypothesis as to why you versus someone else? Because the average person doesn't have that feeling. So have you been able to figure out in hindsight why you were so taken by being big?

I have a few ideas. I'll caveat this idea with the following. A retrospective analysis of why you do things is almost always grotesquely flawed. Most of why we do things is a combination of variables we don't understand and then genetics. And so the whole life story arc, well, it all started when a teacher in the third grade, that's bullshit. That's a backwards justification you made up. So the following statements are backwards justifications I'm making up as just tentative, very not sure hypotheses. Here's a fun story. This will be fun. When I was small or young, my dad would wrestle with me a lot, and he He would always let me win in the end. He was great. He's a great person. And he would always tell me that I was strong and capable. Then in the end of elementary school all the way through the beginning of high school, I was bullied. Honestly, literally a few times, I think I was just the wrong person to bully because that very temporary state of disenfranchisement and powerlessness, I'm never going to be bullied again, to put it simply. I wish I was logical enough that if I was getting robbed by someone at knife point, or not even knife point, just a guy, tried to be like, Hey, man, get out of my way.

No. I said, Get out of my way. I'm going to die here before I move out of your way. You're going to treat me with respect, or one of us is either going to jail or the morgue or the hospital. It's a terrible thing to think. It's stupid beyond belief. Just be like, Sir, my apologies. Please keep going.

But what were you bullied for? Nothing.

Just a kid just wanted to bully people.

We want to understand the concept of what was going through your brain at the time, like what you were thinking in that moment. Because I think we can all think back to, well, unfortunately, too many people can think back to a time when they were bullied in some way, whether it was a day or whether it was something that was a bit more prolonged. It started to embody that pain and shame and that feeling of I'm different from these other kids. Some of my best friends have talked. They've been to therapy, and their therapists have, I think, figured out through some of that retrospective analysis, which obviously a lot of the time isn't accurate, that much of their adult behavior today correlates back to an early experience in such a where they were made to feel a certain way in that social environment where we're so formative. How did it make you feel?

I felt scared, and I felt like I wasn't brave enough to stand up for myself. Later, I began standing up for myself, and that felt very nice. But it felt like I was out of control, and a part of my brain that I didn't consent to made me frown and dipped my head down for me. It was almost like musculature in my neck just deactivated. It's an ancestral mechanism that everyone has. Kids all the way up through teenage and adulthood sort themselves, male children, into dominance hierarchies. It's just the dominance hierarchy sorting itself. Someone confronted me, and I automatically sorted myself beneath them. I felt beneath someone. I felt weaker, more inferior, less apt, less capable, less confident, less strong. I didn't even have consent to it. It's not something I chose. I was like, This kid will beat me up, I better not. It was totally a subconscious behavior. Looking back on it, I did not enjoy how that made me feel.

Do you remember a specific day where a specific thing happened? Because I can think back to a couple of specific days when I was younger that I think shaped me in that regard, where I was pretty much the only Black person in the school. I remember an evening where this particular kid called Sam had cornered me and called me the N-word, and everyone was there. I'll never forget those days. They're etched into your mind as unforgettable memories of pain, of shame, of that feeling. Do you have those a particular day? Yeah, sure. Could you share that with me?

This is getting deep, huh? I have a few incidents. One probably stands out the most. So was a kid named Darren, and he was Black, almost certainly fatherless. Peter naturally, physically developed for his age. He was 10, so was I. We were just wrestling. I wrest with everyone. He beat me in wrestling. He was the only person I believed to beat me in wrestling my whole childhood. Because he was a 14-year-old kid in great shape, and I was a 10-year-old kid. He beat me in wrestling, and that was cordial because he gets into some wrestling. But he had braces, I think, and he cut himself while wrestling with me, and he was bleeding out of his mouth. Then he got really upset about that. And he stood over me. And he was like, You're a little this and that. You did this to me. I'm going to F you up and all this other stuff. And that's when that mechanism switched. When he did that to me, my my whole perspective on the world changed for years. I was a confident, happy kid. And then after that, for four or five years, maybe longer, all of my confidence drained out.

I became introverted. I am not naturally introverted. His presence alone reminded me that I need to keep my head down, and otherwise, I get real scared, and I didn't want to be scared. And so that's how that worked. It wasn't like he got something like, your shit is racial. That's deep, bro. My shit's not deep at all. It's just two kids, and one of them punked it out. I was just the wrong person for that to happen to. And I remember fantasizing when I was in sixth grade, I think, a year later. Wouldn't it be great if I brought a baseball bat to school and just broke his legs and just kept hitting his legs to where he'd never walk right ever again because he wronged me that bad. I felt that deep and true. I'm going to keep the statement as contextual as I can with full understanding of respect for the gravity of what I'm saying. When the Columbine people did what they did, I thought it was egregious and terrible. I also understood how you could be pushed to do that. Now, in their particular case, I don't even know how they were pushed or whatever, but enough bullying will make you consider doing terrible things to regain your honor.

And so that It was probably the most pretty... I was bullied in other situations. Again, I might have been bullied three or four times my whole life, but it just did not sit well with me at all. For a long time, it changed how I express myself to the world. And even right now, as I talk to you, I'm getting pretty emotional. I'll say that if I see that guy again in real life, if he's even around, I have a brown belt in jiu-jitsu now. I'm almost certainly bigger and stronger than him. Is he safe around me? Probably. Can I guarantee his safety if he brings it up? No. If he watches this and hits me up and goes, Hi, got you, little bitch. If I see him in real life, I might take something from him. Medical science can't give him back within the next 5 or 10 years. What a terrible idea. I'd go to jail. I have a lot of really good things going for me. It would be wrong in every single way. It wouldn't even be ethical because he never beat the a lap out of me or anything like that.

It was not like he brutalized me. Oh, my God, I'm going to cripple someone over some bullshit childhood. He was like, also, even he was 10, the gravity of how deeply it feels to me, even right now at age 40, it's like, man, yeah, that shit definitely meant something.

It's interesting Because I think for the first... I'm 31 now, so I think for the first 27 years of my life, if you'd asked me why I do what I do, I would have, in hindsight, probably told you a story that sounds a little bit heroic, i. E. I have this drive I have this motivation and I had this goal, and I went after it, and it was all like self-agency and all that stuff. But the more and more I've learned about, I think, psychology generally and how humans, as I often say, are sometimes driven and they're dragged, and it's hard to tell the difference, like whether something is drive or whether it's like you're being dragged. Compulsion. Compulsion that you just can't explain because of maybe a trauma or an experience you went through or maybe the household you grew up in. I think I'm leaning more now towards the dragged side of things in most areas of my life, especially where I exhibit atypical behavior.

What?

The fact that I work seven days a week, and I've always been absolutely obsessed with achievement and success.

Why do you think that is?

Because I think I grew up in a context where the thing that invalidated me was that. We were the poor family that didn't have things, and I was Black in an all-white area. I was just full of shame growing up. I think I saw that medicine to the shame as being material success. It was the thing that I lied, cheated, and stole to try and achieve. It's been my orientation for my whole life. I think deep within me is this story that success and material success and all those things make me enough. And I didn't feel like- Inside. Inside, yeah. I didn't feel like I was enough. And as much as I'm aware of that now, it doesn't mean that it's going to stop.

So it didn't. Do you feel like you're enough?

Well, it's interesting because if you ask me, do I feel like I'm enough? I'd say, yes. I'm very comfortable with who I am. I think I have somewhat of an accurate reflection of who I am to some degree. But then also I contrast that with the fact that Why am I still just obsessively driving towards these ever bigger goals in a way that's really atypical, not the average person? Why does it matter so much to me? That's where I go, Okay, there's something different in my wiring. It's still an element, this proving my worth to myself or proving to the kids back on the playground that they should respect me in some way or whatever. It's complicated. I say this not because it makes me sound great, because it certainly doesn't. I just say it because I really believe that the more honest I can be with myself, the closer I can get to everything that I want. Oh, sure. The closer I can get to holding the steering wheel, not being dragged with a rope at the back of a car. I'm trying to hold this steering wheel in my life, and that starts with honest self-awareness, and one that honestly has only come from being more and more confident and caring less about what people think.

I wouldn't have said this on camera. There's millions of people probably listening right now. I wouldn't have said these things about myself. It sounds icky me.

Oh, I've never told this bullying story to anyone but a few people. When you brought it up, Tell me about when you were bullied, in my head, I was like, Holy shit. All right. This is where this goes.

Well, I just think it's everyone I've met. You're the same as everyone I've met in that regard.

Probably if I had to write that fake backstory arc explaining my life, the bullying thing is a little bit minor. I have a really gnarly story about having really severe attention deficit disorder when I was younger, while at the same time growing up in an Ashkanazi Jewish family. For Ashkanazi Jewish Russian immigrants to the US, you were either good at school or you were worthless. It's not just that my parents thought that. They didn't really think that at a deep level. They didn't believe it on a surface level. I thought that. You can't make fun of someone for being fat. If they're cool with being fat, they're like, Yeah, I'm fucking big. Hell, yeah. And you're like, Oh, it didn't work. But if they believe that being fat is terrible, you can be like, Hey, how much do you weigh? And that's it. Everything changes. So for me, I believed I had a destiny to be at least competent at school. And up until I was 14, I was in contention for being the worst student at any single school I attended at any single time. And the bitter sweet element was my dad is a PhD in mathematical modeling of atmospheric physical phenomena.

And my mom was a translator of the Russian language, translator English to Russian, and got a master's degree in social work in her second language in America a few years after we got in. That's the legacy I'm dealing with. And I can't do math problems three grades younger than the kids. I got held back in school a grade. And so I took that not so well. And so later, because I was medicated for attention deficit, it was a revelatory experience. As I came up and grew into the idea that was actually fairly intelligent, I had something to prove. And it's getting better now because I've taken enough IQ tests. And you can only write so many books and be on so many podcasts until people are like, You're pretty smart, and you got to start believing in unless you're totally irrational. At some point that sinks in. So one thing I will say is there are ways of dealing with demons and insufficiencies that you've developed through your childhood. Some of them are just having a real deep personal journey in your own head, consistently reinforcing good attitudes, not reinforcing the bad ones. Others are talking to friends, family.

Other ones are therapy, which is excellent for this. But I got to tell you, Steven, I'm not sure if this is true, but there's got to be something to proving the opposite is true, to doing it all, to getting, I don't know the top or whatever, but to no one in their right mind with this point be like, This guy is below average intelligence. That would be preposterous to say, I've taken the Raven's advanced progressive matrices test and I pegged at scale high. So you get every single question right. And so my IQ is above 160. We don't know how high because they don't do standardize IQ tests above that. You do that enough times, enough PhD program, enough book, enough teaching awards, enough authorships, enough all the stuff, enough millions and app designs and all the stuff, and dealing with otherwise really smart people, and they walk away being like, Fuck, that guy's real smart. Enough of that makes you swim in a warm, comfortable sea that heals you in a way that maybe therapy can, but God damn, there's something to just do in the fucking thing You take a skinny little kid who's bullied, you make him Muhammad Ali, champion of the world.

Enough title fights later. You're like, Hey, Muhammad Ali, what you going to do about this? He didn't even flinch. Come at me. So yeah, it's nice to say, and I think it's true that therapy self-care and all these things can heal the soul. There's something about overcoming and becoming superlative to that thing you used to fear that might heal your soul to a huge extent. I think maybe I've witnessed that. Again, Maybe this is all just make believe. It sounds real nice.

No, I completely agree, and it's perfectly what I've experienced in my own life. As you were speaking, I was thinking it's just so clear to me that when you're young, you get evidence. You get a stack of evidence about who who you are and what the world is. What you then have done for the next 10, 20, 30 years is to counteract that evidence with new evidence. I think about it like a library. I think everything that I went through and you went through when you were younger just added one book to this shelf The interesting context of the library is those books are both informative. They're both non-fiction books, but they're also fiction books, and they're also instruction manuals for what you'll do in the future. If you think about those first 18 years of your life, what you did is you filled this library full of int books, stories, self-stories. And this library that you've collected is just a bunch of stories that you believe about yourself. Now, if you want to change some of these stories, unfortunately, you have to get new books. Yes. So what you did in your life is you pursued hard things that would put new books on the shelf.

And when a new book comes on the shelf, that counteracts another one. You have to take the old one-off. But you can't just sit around willing. As you say, as an eye I've experienced in my life, the only way I can put books up there is to go and get first-party evidence with my own eyes that something else is true. And not just once, over and over. Depending on how stubborn the existing group is.

For sure. And if they're real stubborn, here's my question to you. Do you think that childhood experiences build the books that are hard back Lord of the Rings type of shits, whereas adult experiences that completely countervail a childhood experiences are like a little magazine you'd read on a plane.

In the analogy, when you're a child, you put books on the shelf very quickly. They're all very cheap books because there's nothing on the shelf. So you're just grabbing... Mom says, Pigs can fly on the shelf. As you get older, actually, because there's so many books on the shelf already, and if I just focus on this analogy of pigs flying, there's already a book about aviation on the shelf, which means it's harder to believe that pigs can fly. There's a book already about animals and their anatomy, so you can't add a new one because there's so many counteracting ones already. So this is why they often say that young kids adopt... You can't teach an old dog new tricks because there's so much existing evidence there of something else being true. Kids throw them on the shelf without much interrogation because there's less counteracting books there already. Whereas adults, they take a little bit more time to add a new one because they've got six other books which might tell a different story. If we think about neuroscience and neuroplasticity, it becomes a little bit harder sometimes for adults to... I had a neuroscientist here yesterday saying this to me, that it becomes after you get to past 25 years old, neuroplasticity becomes a little bit more stubborn.

It's still possible up until you die, but it's a little bit more stubborn.

So you You need more reinforcement.

You need more reinforcement, more evidence, more repetitions. And he described it as more focus, more focus on the thing.

One thing that I found maybe is helpful is my wife is similar to me. She's like an insane, super goal-driven, psychotic person. And we have a real trouble taking a step back and telling ourselves, Man, we're doing pretty well. So every now and again, evenings and weekends, especially weekends, we'll do some, it sounds super lame, but gratefulness discussion. Yeah, it's not lame at all. Depending on who you talk to, I guess, to my old child of bullies, that's lame. But it's really weird to say some of these things out loud to yourself. And there's some resistance, especially early, admitting to yourself, I won, I did the thing. Maybe it doesn't work quite that simply, but I think It's good to try because it's a really weird thing to go and be 60 years old and look back on your life and someone's like, So what have you accomplished? Like, not much. It ain't shit. I'm like, I've seen you on book covers. You're like, Right. Oh, that's right. Okay, so I accomplished a lot, but I don't feel like I have. How dare you rob yourself of being able to swim in that beautiful warm sea of self-actualization.

I think it's worth it for people to focus. When you do good, Good? Let yourself bask in that glow. Get your time under the sun.

Amen. It's all about subjective progress. It's all about like... I was going to do a post last night. I was thinking, so many people spend their lives I was scrolling through Instagram, and I wrote the post and I just didn't post it. But I noticed that so many people go through their lives looking for an enemy, looking for the person or the system or the government or the political party that's currently wronging them. They commit their whole life to just this focus of who's wronging me, and I need to point them out and call them out and scream at them. I've never fallen into that trap, but I do have a competition with myself, and I feel like that's very healthy because what I'm actually looking for in myself is some form of progress, whether it's how I show up or with my fitness or with my muscles or whatever. It's constant search for progress in myself. And there, when I do discover progress, I can celebrate it and I can have that gratitude we talked about. And so anyone's progress, whether it's when I went from being a university dropout to getting my first investor.

That is like, oh, my God. And it's only in hindsight, with some aging wisdom, that I start to realize that those moments were so unbelievably important. They're so motivational, identifying your progress. And there's two data points that have really shone a light on this for me is one of them was Sir David Braillesfield, who took the British cycling team from being down and out and depressed to the greatest team of all time winning all the gold medals. He said, yes, the marginal gains thing that he's known for, that's in the front chapter of Atomic Habits was key. But actually, he said to me, he went, When you can get a group of people or a person to feel like they're going somewhere because they have a sense of progress, he goes, That's what made us stay in the bike shop till 2:00 AM in the morning. I read another study from Harvard Business Review, where they asked people to keep work diaries. And then at the end of the study, they said, point at the day where you had your best day in work. And people always pointed in their work diaries to a day where there was a feeling of subjective progress, even small.

And that makes you motivated. You feel like you are going somewhere, which means you're more likely to do it. So gratitude serves the happiness role, but also just a motivational one. We have a closing tradition on this podcast where the last guest leaves a question for the next guest not knowing who they're going to leave it for. And the question That has been left for you is- Oh, crap. What is the most meaningful dream, brackets, nightmare, you've ever had and why?

I don't know if this is the most meaningful dream, but... Jesus Christ, I'm really going to say this. Fine. When I was a young adult, I was starting to experience success with the opposite sex, and I just did not ever experience that when I was younger or already of the age, but younger. It's just probably a bit of a hang-up. For most people, it's like when you're not getting it, you feel out of it. When I started experiencing success with women, my dreams at night changed. One of them was The following dream has nothing to do with females and sex, but it had to do with power, and it had to do with an ability that you can. I ran out of my childhood home into the street, and it wasn't the street anymore. It was just a black empty void, and it became a lucid dream. So I knew a little bit that it was a dream. It was like, Oh, I'm going to do cool Dragon Ball Z stuff. You know what Dragon Ball Z is, the anime show? And I opened up my hand and I wanted to make a fireball, and I made an energy ball that was like a singularity size, but it was made of people's screams.

It was like... And then I woke I was like, That was so cool. Not victim screams, just Viking screams. I was like, That is the coolest shit. I had multiple other dreams in my young adult life after Successes of Women, which were dreams of power. I was like, God damn, if I can have those dreams every night, it'll be super happy.

That's the most interesting dream I've ever had about following someone losing their virginity.

I didn't say I lost my... Get out of here. I still haven't lost my virginity. I've been a good I'm not a person.

Dr. Mike, thank you so much for your wisdom and your information and all the work that you've done in your life because it's formed a wonderfully important perspective on a subject that so many people struggle with. I'm going to ask you, I'm going to leave you with my last question, which is, what is the most important thing that we didn't talk about today as it relates to the subject matter of getting in shape, building muscle that we should have talked about? Is there anything we left off the table?

There's a lot to this, so we left a lot out. I have a lot more to say about body dysmorphia and how people do relate to their bodies and how they maybe shouldn't or try to weave their thoughts away from various ideas and how maybe they should try to relate to their bodies better. It's a conversation I love to have. I just don't ever get asked about it super often. I think that in body dysmorphia in in self-esteem as it relates to bodies of guys that grew up too skinny, of girls that grew up too fat, I think a combination of getting the body that you want, soaking in the sun and really being like, I'm the hot girl now. This is really happening. And how to relate to your body. There's a plethora of wonderful conversation around that. If I had a time machine, I'd go back and interrupt you and just be like, Let's talk about that instead.

Maybe we can say that for another time. Sure. Dr. Mike, thank you so much. Where do people find you? Your YouTube channel is incredible, so I'll link that below.

Just YouTube. Just YouTube. Everything links off of YouTube.

And you've got your app as well, which people can go and check out.

Links off of YouTube as well.Links off of YouTube.2 apps.

Okay, so if I go to your YouTube channel, I can find everything. Boom. Great. Dr. Mike, thank you so much.

Huge honor and pleasure. Thank you so much.

Isn't this cool? Every single conversation I have here on the Diary of a CEO, at the very end of it, you'll know, I ask the guest to leave a question in the Diary of a CEO. And what we've done is we've turned every single question written in the diary of a CEO into these conversation cards that you can play at home. So you've got every guest we've ever had, their question, and on the back of it, if you scan that QR code, you get to watch the person who answered that question. We're finally revealing all of the questions and the people that answered the question. The brand new version Version 2 updated conversation cards are out right now at theconversationcards. Com. They sold out twice instantaneously. If you are interested in getting hold of some limited edition conversation cards, I really, really recommend acting quickly..