Support for Prop G is brought to you by Viori. Are you sick and tired of traditional old workout gear? Viori wants to provide you with a new perspective on performance apparel. Everything is designed to work out in, but also look and feel great outside the gym as well. Viori's products are incredibly versatile. You can wear them running, training, stretching, or just lounging around. Viori sent me the Elevate Core Shorts and Stratotec Tee, and I like the way they feel, the form-fitting. I feel strong in them. I feel sleek in them. I feel like a jungle cat. Viori is an investment in your happiness. For our listeners, they are offering 20% off your first purchase. Get yourself some of the most comfortable and versatile there. But I had never heard him talk that way, and he was defiant, saying me. That isn't the usual ethos of Joe Biden, and that is certainly not the ethos of the Democratic Party or what we purport to be. There are rumors that the DNC might hold an early vote on making him the nominee and do that virtually. People are pushing back againstinteresting to me about looking at the post debate was how much grassroots went way up. It may be a function of seeing Biden as he is, a very decent man who cares about other people. I always worry a little bit about what the perspectives are and make sure that you can see what is the everyday American or the perspectives and not just from where I sit.But to put a fine point on, you're one of the deepest voices in the Democratic Party right now. People listen to you, Reid. Where are you today? Do you feel the best course of action would be to mature battle tests and support and rally around another candidate, or for us to stop this and rally around Biden?Well, I would like to see Biden show the vigor of campaigning that he going to need to see. It's not just like the ABC interview, but maybe call it the ABC interview every day. If we see that, then I think we should be rallying around Biden and stopping this discussion. If we don't see that, if this is just the... Look, he's dedicated his entire life to public service. This is everything he's done, and it's contributed massively. But if it was like, look, I can only imagine what running at his age is like. If it was like, look, I'm too tired for this, then it's like, then I think we should open up the field.But you do still think it's a possibility that he can demonstrate that type of vigor in a short enough time to give people an option, that it's not a run-out-the-clock strategy that you think that there- No, I would oppose a run-out-the-clock strategy.My voice, and as much as my voice matters in any of this stuff, is, Come be vigorous now.You wrote a pretty powerful piece. I think I read it in The Economist talking about that Silicon Valley business leaders who are endorsing Trump because they believe he is better for business. What is the sentiment you've been hearing and how exactly... Why do you think Trump is bad for business?So I think that people say, Oh, it's obvious that Trump's better for business because he's a business person, he lowers regulation, he's lower taxes, all the classic things that people say, Hey, that's good for business. But what they miss is what's fundamentally critical for business is a stable society, a rule of law society, open markets and good relationships with other countries for products and services. In all of that, Trump is essentially a disaster. And so part of the reason I wrote this piece for business people was to say, Don't think, Oh, 1% or 2% differences in tax rates matter. Don't think that... Look, and I actually appreciate it. It's one of the things people say, Are you objective about Trump? And I was like, Yeah, actually. I think one of the things that he did well was to say, Hey, if you want a new regulation, remove an old regulation. I think that's a good factoring of regulation stance, but don't think that's what's most important for business. What's actually, in fact, important for business is rule of law and stability, and Trump basically attacks all of that.I came of professional age in the valley, but I don't feel as if I'm in touch with it because I've been gone so long. This might be a reductive analysis, but I find there's this frightening vein or ideology in the valley of this techno libertarian notion that government is bad and that if we could just let smarter people run the company, defer to the markets, and specifically, if the markets could defer to the technology leaders, that we'd all be better off. I find it very disconcerting, given that I don't think these individuals recognize how blessed they are by some of the underpinnings of M Blessings, rule of law, an incredible business ecosystem. Am I being dramatic here? Is there a concerning vein of this techno libertarian within the valley?No, I don't think you're being dramatic. I basically completely agree. It's one of the reasons why I argue for the value of government, the value of better government. There's never a great government. There's always inefficiencies there. But the difference between, call it B and B plus, can actually make a very big difference. And I think the libertarian thing, which, by the way, in some places, comes from places that are not terrible, which is like, Hey, we can build amazing new companies, amazing new technologies. Those can make a very big difference. I agree with all of that very strongly. But the notion that is like, Oh, government is bad or gets in the way, it's like, Well, actually, in fact, if you look at everything that our Silicon Valley entrepreneurship can create comes from many different platforms that government has enabled. It isn't just rule of law, it isn't just a piece of society, it isn't just a university system and technology system and funding of these technologies that then get created in the companies. But it's the very the system that we can deploy our products and services and higher talent and offer stock for sale.And all of that's within a government-regulated environment. I frequently argue vociferously with what I refer to as techno libertarians.Let's switch to AI. Where are you most bearish and bullish when it comes to use cases and applications?Let's see. On the bearish side, what I would say is that there's a couple of things. One is it's hard to know exactly where to be bearish over time because I think Ethan Mullet and Cointelligence said something that's a good maxim, which is the worst AI you're ever going to use is the AI you're using today. And there's a bunch of things that are being developed. Now, I think people being overly polyamish about, Oh, AI is going to solve fusion for us in three years, is, I think, a mistake in various ways. In the positive sense, I think that it's funny, even with all the hype, I think it's to some degree understated relative to if you think about the fact we are language creatures and that everything we do is in language and you have at minimum a language amplifier. So you say, Well, I have a steel manufacturing and David Axelrod how they feel on Today Explained.Amen. You're an investor, and a couple of the things you've invested in are you funded E. Jean Carroll's defamation suit against President Trump, and now you're helping finance Smartmatic's case. I'm just curious. It feels I think it's a new wave of investing. I don't know if you pioneered it or Peter Thiel did, but it's a very interesting means of, I call it investing. I don't know what the term would be, but walk us through your thought process for why you decided to do it and talk a little bit about the dramatic case and why you've decided to get behind it.It feels a little strange, and I wish... I didn't feel the need to be doing what I was doing here, but it's very much rule of law and high functioning democracy. Part of the thing here is to say, Look, we should always be resolved to as a strong a rule of law system as possible. Now, part of that, by the way, for example, every single scholarly and any source of integrity says the 2020 election was fair. It was fair. It doesn't mean it was perfect, but it was fair to the standards of every other election in modern history. Then you get to, okay, well, people who attack that are trying to degrade our democracy, degrade our trust and belief in rule of law. And by the way, that trust is part of how it functions. And so supporting the rule of law is the thing that has been, I'd say, fundamental across my democracy investing, but also in terms of saying, Hey, let's have the legal system work, because one of the things that as you saw with, for example, the Dominion suit against Fox is unlike when you're litigating just a freedom of speech political thing, people can lie through their teeth and have no consequences.When you're lying through your teeth and saying, Hey, the 2020 election was stolen, and your texts show that you're lying through your teeth and that that's the influence that you, as a news media organization, are having upon the culture, beliefs, et cetera, society, in a commercial case, you're allowed to be held accountable by a jury, by a system of law, by depositions and inquiry, by showing what your actual communications are to each other about how you're lying with this. I think that's part of what's really important. People say, Well, I've heard the clair, that's lawful. It's like, Look, the whole point about our legal system and having 12 jurors, for example, the 12 jurors who convicted Donald Trump unanimously of 34 felonies on doing hush money payments and covering itgood things in my life were 90% me and 10% the market, and all of the bad things that happened to me were 10% me and 90% the market. The reality is it's probably somewhere around 51% things outside of your control and 49% you. What's the learning here? When things are going really well, be humble, and when things aren't going well, forgive yourself. This episode was produced by Caroline Shagrin. Jennifer Sanchez is our Associate Producer, and Drew Burrows is our Technical Director. Thank you for listening to the Propgy Pod from the Box Media Podcast Network. We will catch you on Saturday for No Mercy, No Malice, as read by George Han. And please follow our Profit Markets pod wherever you get your pods for new episodes every Monday and Thursday.Support for The show came from capital. Com. With their intuitive platform, in-depth trading guides, and real-time data from thousands of global markets, capital. Com can help you take more control of your trading decisions. Trade smart with capital. Com. Go to capital. Com/box to learn more. 75% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

there. But I had never heard him talk that way, and he was defiant, saying me. That isn't the usual ethos of Joe Biden, and that is certainly not the ethos of the Democratic Party or what we purport to be. There are rumors that the DNC might hold an early vote on making him the nominee and do that virtually. People are pushing back againstinteresting to me about looking at the post debate was how much grassroots went way up. It may be a function of seeing Biden as he is, a very decent man who cares about other people. I always worry a little bit about what the perspectives are and make sure that you can see what is the everyday American or the perspectives and not just from where I sit.But to put a fine point on, you're one of the deepest voices in the Democratic Party right now. People listen to you, Reid. Where are you today? Do you feel the best course of action would be to mature battle tests and support and rally around another candidate, or for us to stop this and rally around Biden?Well, I would like to see Biden show the vigor of campaigning that he going to need to see. It's not just like the ABC interview, but maybe call it the ABC interview every day. If we see that, then I think we should be rallying around Biden and stopping this discussion. If we don't see that, if this is just the... Look, he's dedicated his entire life to public service. This is everything he's done, and it's contributed massively. But if it was like, look, I can only imagine what running at his age is like. If it was like, look, I'm too tired for this, then it's like, then I think we should open up the field.But you do still think it's a possibility that he can demonstrate that type of vigor in a short enough time to give people an option, that it's not a run-out-the-clock strategy that you think that there- No, I would oppose a run-out-the-clock strategy.My voice, and as much as my voice matters in any of this stuff, is, Come be vigorous now.You wrote a pretty powerful piece. I think I read it in The Economist talking about that Silicon Valley business leaders who are endorsing Trump because they believe he is better for business. What is the sentiment you've been hearing and how exactly... Why do you think Trump is bad for business?So I think that people say, Oh, it's obvious that Trump's better for business because he's a business person, he lowers regulation, he's lower taxes, all the classic things that people say, Hey, that's good for business. But what they miss is what's fundamentally critical for business is a stable society, a rule of law society, open markets and good relationships with other countries for products and services. In all of that, Trump is essentially a disaster. And so part of the reason I wrote this piece for business people was to say, Don't think, Oh, 1% or 2% differences in tax rates matter. Don't think that... Look, and I actually appreciate it. It's one of the things people say, Are you objective about Trump? And I was like, Yeah, actually. I think one of the things that he did well was to say, Hey, if you want a new regulation, remove an old regulation. I think that's a good factoring of regulation stance, but don't think that's what's most important for business. What's actually, in fact, important for business is rule of law and stability, and Trump basically attacks all of that.I came of professional age in the valley, but I don't feel as if I'm in touch with it because I've been gone so long. This might be a reductive analysis, but I find there's this frightening vein or ideology in the valley of this techno libertarian notion that government is bad and that if we could just let smarter people run the company, defer to the markets, and specifically, if the markets could defer to the technology leaders, that we'd all be better off. I find it very disconcerting, given that I don't think these individuals recognize how blessed they are by some of the underpinnings of M Blessings, rule of law, an incredible business ecosystem. Am I being dramatic here? Is there a concerning vein of this techno libertarian within the valley?No, I don't think you're being dramatic. I basically completely agree. It's one of the reasons why I argue for the value of government, the value of better government. There's never a great government. There's always inefficiencies there. But the difference between, call it B and B plus, can actually make a very big difference. And I think the libertarian thing, which, by the way, in some places, comes from places that are not terrible, which is like, Hey, we can build amazing new companies, amazing new technologies. Those can make a very big difference. I agree with all of that very strongly. But the notion that is like, Oh, government is bad or gets in the way, it's like, Well, actually, in fact, if you look at everything that our Silicon Valley entrepreneurship can create comes from many different platforms that government has enabled. It isn't just rule of law, it isn't just a piece of society, it isn't just a university system and technology system and funding of these technologies that then get created in the companies. But it's the very the system that we can deploy our products and services and higher talent and offer stock for sale.And all of that's within a government-regulated environment. I frequently argue vociferously with what I refer to as techno libertarians.Let's switch to AI. Where are you most bearish and bullish when it comes to use cases and applications?Let's see. On the bearish side, what I would say is that there's a couple of things. One is it's hard to know exactly where to be bearish over time because I think Ethan Mullet and Cointelligence said something that's a good maxim, which is the worst AI you're ever going to use is the AI you're using today. And there's a bunch of things that are being developed. Now, I think people being overly polyamish about, Oh, AI is going to solve fusion for us in three years, is, I think, a mistake in various ways. In the positive sense, I think that it's funny, even with all the hype, I think it's to some degree understated relative to if you think about the fact we are language creatures and that everything we do is in language and you have at minimum a language amplifier. So you say, Well, I have a steel manufacturing and David Axelrod how they feel on Today Explained.Amen. You're an investor, and a couple of the things you've invested in are you funded E. Jean Carroll's defamation suit against President Trump, and now you're helping finance Smartmatic's case. I'm just curious. It feels I think it's a new wave of investing. I don't know if you pioneered it or Peter Thiel did, but it's a very interesting means of, I call it investing. I don't know what the term would be, but walk us through your thought process for why you decided to do it and talk a little bit about the dramatic case and why you've decided to get behind it.It feels a little strange, and I wish... I didn't feel the need to be doing what I was doing here, but it's very much rule of law and high functioning democracy. Part of the thing here is to say, Look, we should always be resolved to as a strong a rule of law system as possible. Now, part of that, by the way, for example, every single scholarly and any source of integrity says the 2020 election was fair. It was fair. It doesn't mean it was perfect, but it was fair to the standards of every other election in modern history. Then you get to, okay, well, people who attack that are trying to degrade our democracy, degrade our trust and belief in rule of law. And by the way, that trust is part of how it functions. And so supporting the rule of law is the thing that has been, I'd say, fundamental across my democracy investing, but also in terms of saying, Hey, let's have the legal system work, because one of the things that as you saw with, for example, the Dominion suit against Fox is unlike when you're litigating just a freedom of speech political thing, people can lie through their teeth and have no consequences.When you're lying through your teeth and saying, Hey, the 2020 election was stolen, and your texts show that you're lying through your teeth and that that's the influence that you, as a news media organization, are having upon the culture, beliefs, et cetera, society, in a commercial case, you're allowed to be held accountable by a jury, by a system of law, by depositions and inquiry, by showing what your actual communications are to each other about how you're lying with this. I think that's part of what's really important. People say, Well, I've heard the clair, that's lawful. It's like, Look, the whole point about our legal system and having 12 jurors, for example, the 12 jurors who convicted Donald Trump unanimously of 34 felonies on doing hush money payments and covering itgood things in my life were 90% me and 10% the market, and all of the bad things that happened to me were 10% me and 90% the market. The reality is it's probably somewhere around 51% things outside of your control and 49% you. What's the learning here? When things are going really well, be humble, and when things aren't going well, forgive yourself. This episode was produced by Caroline Shagrin. Jennifer Sanchez is our Associate Producer, and Drew Burrows is our Technical Director. Thank you for listening to the Propgy Pod from the Box Media Podcast Network. We will catch you on Saturday for No Mercy, No Malice, as read by George Han. And please follow our Profit Markets pod wherever you get your pods for new episodes every Monday and Thursday.Support for The show came from capital. Com. With their intuitive platform, in-depth trading guides, and real-time data from thousands of global markets, capital. Com can help you take more control of your trading decisions. Trade smart with capital. Com. Go to capital. Com/box to learn more. 75% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

interesting to me about looking at the post debate was how much grassroots went way up. It may be a function of seeing Biden as he is, a very decent man who cares about other people. I always worry a little bit about what the perspectives are and make sure that you can see what is the everyday American or the perspectives and not just from where I sit.

But to put a fine point on, you're one of the deepest voices in the Democratic Party right now. People listen to you, Reid. Where are you today? Do you feel the best course of action would be to mature battle tests and support and rally around another candidate, or for us to stop this and rally around Biden?

Well, I would like to see Biden show the vigor of campaigning that he going to need to see. It's not just like the ABC interview, but maybe call it the ABC interview every day. If we see that, then I think we should be rallying around Biden and stopping this discussion. If we don't see that, if this is just the... Look, he's dedicated his entire life to public service. This is everything he's done, and it's contributed massively. But if it was like, look, I can only imagine what running at his age is like. If it was like, look, I'm too tired for this, then it's like, then I think we should open up the field.

But you do still think it's a possibility that he can demonstrate that type of vigor in a short enough time to give people an option, that it's not a run-out-the-clock strategy that you think that there- No, I would oppose a run-out-the-clock strategy.

My voice, and as much as my voice matters in any of this stuff, is, Come be vigorous now.

You wrote a pretty powerful piece. I think I read it in The Economist talking about that Silicon Valley business leaders who are endorsing Trump because they believe he is better for business. What is the sentiment you've been hearing and how exactly... Why do you think Trump is bad for business?

So I think that people say, Oh, it's obvious that Trump's better for business because he's a business person, he lowers regulation, he's lower taxes, all the classic things that people say, Hey, that's good for business. But what they miss is what's fundamentally critical for business is a stable society, a rule of law society, open markets and good relationships with other countries for products and services. In all of that, Trump is essentially a disaster. And so part of the reason I wrote this piece for business people was to say, Don't think, Oh, 1% or 2% differences in tax rates matter. Don't think that... Look, and I actually appreciate it. It's one of the things people say, Are you objective about Trump? And I was like, Yeah, actually. I think one of the things that he did well was to say, Hey, if you want a new regulation, remove an old regulation. I think that's a good factoring of regulation stance, but don't think that's what's most important for business. What's actually, in fact, important for business is rule of law and stability, and Trump basically attacks all of that.

I came of professional age in the valley, but I don't feel as if I'm in touch with it because I've been gone so long. This might be a reductive analysis, but I find there's this frightening vein or ideology in the valley of this techno libertarian notion that government is bad and that if we could just let smarter people run the company, defer to the markets, and specifically, if the markets could defer to the technology leaders, that we'd all be better off. I find it very disconcerting, given that I don't think these individuals recognize how blessed they are by some of the underpinnings of M Blessings, rule of law, an incredible business ecosystem. Am I being dramatic here? Is there a concerning vein of this techno libertarian within the valley?

No, I don't think you're being dramatic. I basically completely agree. It's one of the reasons why I argue for the value of government, the value of better government. There's never a great government. There's always inefficiencies there. But the difference between, call it B and B plus, can actually make a very big difference. And I think the libertarian thing, which, by the way, in some places, comes from places that are not terrible, which is like, Hey, we can build amazing new companies, amazing new technologies. Those can make a very big difference. I agree with all of that very strongly. But the notion that is like, Oh, government is bad or gets in the way, it's like, Well, actually, in fact, if you look at everything that our Silicon Valley entrepreneurship can create comes from many different platforms that government has enabled. It isn't just rule of law, it isn't just a piece of society, it isn't just a university system and technology system and funding of these technologies that then get created in the companies. But it's the very the system that we can deploy our products and services and higher talent and offer stock for sale.

And all of that's within a government-regulated environment. I frequently argue vociferously with what I refer to as techno libertarians.

Let's switch to AI. Where are you most bearish and bullish when it comes to use cases and applications?

Let's see. On the bearish side, what I would say is that there's a couple of things. One is it's hard to know exactly where to be bearish over time because I think Ethan Mullet and Cointelligence said something that's a good maxim, which is the worst AI you're ever going to use is the AI you're using today. And there's a bunch of things that are being developed. Now, I think people being overly polyamish about, Oh, AI is going to solve fusion for us in three years, is, I think, a mistake in various ways. In the positive sense, I think that it's funny, even with all the hype, I think it's to some degree understated relative to if you think about the fact we are language creatures and that everything we do is in language and you have at minimum a language amplifier. So you say, Well, I have a steel manufacturing and David Axelrod how they feel on Today Explained.Amen. You're an investor, and a couple of the things you've invested in are you funded E. Jean Carroll's defamation suit against President Trump, and now you're helping finance Smartmatic's case. I'm just curious. It feels I think it's a new wave of investing. I don't know if you pioneered it or Peter Thiel did, but it's a very interesting means of, I call it investing. I don't know what the term would be, but walk us through your thought process for why you decided to do it and talk a little bit about the dramatic case and why you've decided to get behind it.It feels a little strange, and I wish... I didn't feel the need to be doing what I was doing here, but it's very much rule of law and high functioning democracy. Part of the thing here is to say, Look, we should always be resolved to as a strong a rule of law system as possible. Now, part of that, by the way, for example, every single scholarly and any source of integrity says the 2020 election was fair. It was fair. It doesn't mean it was perfect, but it was fair to the standards of every other election in modern history. Then you get to, okay, well, people who attack that are trying to degrade our democracy, degrade our trust and belief in rule of law. And by the way, that trust is part of how it functions. And so supporting the rule of law is the thing that has been, I'd say, fundamental across my democracy investing, but also in terms of saying, Hey, let's have the legal system work, because one of the things that as you saw with, for example, the Dominion suit against Fox is unlike when you're litigating just a freedom of speech political thing, people can lie through their teeth and have no consequences.When you're lying through your teeth and saying, Hey, the 2020 election was stolen, and your texts show that you're lying through your teeth and that that's the influence that you, as a news media organization, are having upon the culture, beliefs, et cetera, society, in a commercial case, you're allowed to be held accountable by a jury, by a system of law, by depositions and inquiry, by showing what your actual communications are to each other about how you're lying with this. I think that's part of what's really important. People say, Well, I've heard the clair, that's lawful. It's like, Look, the whole point about our legal system and having 12 jurors, for example, the 12 jurors who convicted Donald Trump unanimously of 34 felonies on doing hush money payments and covering itgood things in my life were 90% me and 10% the market, and all of the bad things that happened to me were 10% me and 90% the market. The reality is it's probably somewhere around 51% things outside of your control and 49% you. What's the learning here? When things are going really well, be humble, and when things aren't going well, forgive yourself. This episode was produced by Caroline Shagrin. Jennifer Sanchez is our Associate Producer, and Drew Burrows is our Technical Director. Thank you for listening to the Propgy Pod from the Box Media Podcast Network. We will catch you on Saturday for No Mercy, No Malice, as read by George Han. And please follow our Profit Markets pod wherever you get your pods for new episodes every Monday and Thursday.Support for The show came from capital. Com. With their intuitive platform, in-depth trading guides, and real-time data from thousands of global markets, capital. Com can help you take more control of your trading decisions. Trade smart with capital. Com. Go to capital. Com/box to learn more. 75% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

and David Axelrod how they feel on Today Explained.

Amen. You're an investor, and a couple of the things you've invested in are you funded E. Jean Carroll's defamation suit against President Trump, and now you're helping finance Smartmatic's case. I'm just curious. It feels I think it's a new wave of investing. I don't know if you pioneered it or Peter Thiel did, but it's a very interesting means of, I call it investing. I don't know what the term would be, but walk us through your thought process for why you decided to do it and talk a little bit about the dramatic case and why you've decided to get behind it.

It feels a little strange, and I wish... I didn't feel the need to be doing what I was doing here, but it's very much rule of law and high functioning democracy. Part of the thing here is to say, Look, we should always be resolved to as a strong a rule of law system as possible. Now, part of that, by the way, for example, every single scholarly and any source of integrity says the 2020 election was fair. It was fair. It doesn't mean it was perfect, but it was fair to the standards of every other election in modern history. Then you get to, okay, well, people who attack that are trying to degrade our democracy, degrade our trust and belief in rule of law. And by the way, that trust is part of how it functions. And so supporting the rule of law is the thing that has been, I'd say, fundamental across my democracy investing, but also in terms of saying, Hey, let's have the legal system work, because one of the things that as you saw with, for example, the Dominion suit against Fox is unlike when you're litigating just a freedom of speech political thing, people can lie through their teeth and have no consequences.

When you're lying through your teeth and saying, Hey, the 2020 election was stolen, and your texts show that you're lying through your teeth and that that's the influence that you, as a news media organization, are having upon the culture, beliefs, et cetera, society, in a commercial case, you're allowed to be held accountable by a jury, by a system of law, by depositions and inquiry, by showing what your actual communications are to each other about how you're lying with this. I think that's part of what's really important. People say, Well, I've heard the clair, that's lawful. It's like, Look, the whole point about our legal system and having 12 jurors, for example, the 12 jurors who convicted Donald Trump unanimously of 34 felonies on doing hush money payments and covering itgood things in my life were 90% me and 10% the market, and all of the bad things that happened to me were 10% me and 90% the market. The reality is it's probably somewhere around 51% things outside of your control and 49% you. What's the learning here? When things are going really well, be humble, and when things aren't going well, forgive yourself. This episode was produced by Caroline Shagrin. Jennifer Sanchez is our Associate Producer, and Drew Burrows is our Technical Director. Thank you for listening to the Propgy Pod from the Box Media Podcast Network. We will catch you on Saturday for No Mercy, No Malice, as read by George Han. And please follow our Profit Markets pod wherever you get your pods for new episodes every Monday and Thursday.Support for The show came from capital. Com. With their intuitive platform, in-depth trading guides, and real-time data from thousands of global markets, capital. Com can help you take more control of your trading decisions. Trade smart with capital. Com. Go to capital. Com/box to learn more. 75% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

good things in my life were 90% me and 10% the market, and all of the bad things that happened to me were 10% me and 90% the market. The reality is it's probably somewhere around 51% things outside of your control and 49% you. What's the learning here? When things are going really well, be humble, and when things aren't going well, forgive yourself. This episode was produced by Caroline Shagrin. Jennifer Sanchez is our Associate Producer, and Drew Burrows is our Technical Director. Thank you for listening to the Propgy Pod from the Box Media Podcast Network. We will catch you on Saturday for No Mercy, No Malice, as read by George Han. And please follow our Profit Markets pod wherever you get your pods for new episodes every Monday and Thursday.

Support for The show came from capital. Com. With their intuitive platform, in-depth trading guides, and real-time data from thousands of global markets, capital. Com can help you take more control of your trading decisions. Trade smart with capital. Com. Go to capital. Com/box to learn more. 75% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.